Agency and rhythmic coordination

are we naught but moving dots?

Charles Coey, Manuel Varlet, R. C. Schmidt, Michael Richardson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding contribution

Abstract

There is contention in perceptual-motor research concerning the degree to which observing biological and non-biological movements have equivalent effects on movement production. This issue results from the proposal that action observation and production share neural resources (i.e., mirror neurons) particularly sensitive to actions performed by other ‘agents’ (i.e., beings with goals/intentions). In support of this claim, several discrete and rhythmic action-observation studies found that action production is only affected when participants believed that observed actions were produced by an agent. Here we present data from two experiments investigating whether similar agency manipulations also affect spontaneous movement synchrony. Collectively, the results suggest that belief in the ‘agency’ of an observed movement does not affect the emergence and stability of rhythmic movement synchrony. These results question whether the actions of other agents are truly privileged across all scales of coordinated activity, particularly with respect to the lawful dynamics underlying movement synchrony.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationExpanding the space of cognitive science
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci2011)
EditorsLaura Carlson, Christoph Hoelscher, Thomas F. Shipley
Place of PublicationAustin, TX
PublisherCognitive Science Society
Pages172-177
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
EventAnnual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (33rd : 2011) - Boston, Massachusetts
Duration: 20 Jul 201123 Jul 2011

Conference

ConferenceAnnual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (33rd : 2011)
CityBoston, Massachusetts
Period20/07/1123/07/11

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Agency and rhythmic coordination: are we naught but moving dots?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Coey, C., Varlet, M., Schmidt, R. C., & Richardson, M. (2011). Agency and rhythmic coordination: are we naught but moving dots? In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Expanding the space of cognitive science: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci2011) (pp. 172-177). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.