Abstract
We extend an influential contribution to the literature on agency theory and then use this extension, along with other theoretical contributions, to shed light on agency problems affecting funds management and financial planning in Australia. The case for pure fee-for-service in actively managed funds and plans turns out to be weak. The amount of money exposed to risk by an active manager should be less than the entire investible wealth of the client, especially in the case of investors on the cusp of retirement. Asset-based fees on actively managed funds should include a fulcrum component.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 290-303 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Australian Economic Review |
Volume | 47 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2014 |