Aggression, definition and assessment of

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionary/reference bookResearch

Abstract

There is yet to be universal acceptance of any one definition of aggression; however, researchers in the field of psychology have tended to broadly agree that aggression is a behavior (which could be physical, verbal, relational/social, direct, or indirect) performed with the intent to hurt another who does not want to be hurt. Acts of aggression can be assessed in many ways, with laboratory experiments examining the willingness to hurt another in a controlled environment, questionnaire research asking about one’s own or another’s aggressive behavior, field research taking observational notes of aggression seen in everyday situations, and brain-scanning research examining changes to the brain associated with aggression. Crucially, each form of assessing aggression has unique strengths and weaknesses, leading to controversy about whether aggression has been truly measured in each case. The best evidence that something causes aggression comes from converging evidence from all types of assessment, each of which can overcome the shortcomings of another. This entry first examines how aggression is defined and categorized, and then examines these four types of aggression assessment that are commonly used in media violence research, describing the strengths and weaknesses of each, noting the assessment methods used, and providing examples.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationEncyclopedia of media violence
EditorsMatthew S Eastin
Place of PublicationThousand Oaks, California
PublisherSAGE Publications
Pages11-15
Number of pages5
ISBN (Print)9781452299655
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

aggression
aggressive behavior
laboratory experiment
field research
evidence
brain
psychology
acceptance
act
violence
cause
questionnaire

Cite this

Warburton, W. (2014). Aggression, definition and assessment of. In M. S. Eastin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of media violence (pp. 11-15). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452299655.n11
Warburton, Wayne. / Aggression, definition and assessment of. Encyclopedia of media violence. editor / Matthew S Eastin. Thousand Oaks, California : SAGE Publications, 2014. pp. 11-15
@inbook{bdae36ed4b054058bb04760c7253dc51,
title = "Aggression, definition and assessment of",
abstract = "There is yet to be universal acceptance of any one definition of aggression; however, researchers in the field of psychology have tended to broadly agree that aggression is a behavior (which could be physical, verbal, relational/social, direct, or indirect) performed with the intent to hurt another who does not want to be hurt. Acts of aggression can be assessed in many ways, with laboratory experiments examining the willingness to hurt another in a controlled environment, questionnaire research asking about one’s own or another’s aggressive behavior, field research taking observational notes of aggression seen in everyday situations, and brain-scanning research examining changes to the brain associated with aggression. Crucially, each form of assessing aggression has unique strengths and weaknesses, leading to controversy about whether aggression has been truly measured in each case. The best evidence that something causes aggression comes from converging evidence from all types of assessment, each of which can overcome the shortcomings of another. This entry first examines how aggression is defined and categorized, and then examines these four types of aggression assessment that are commonly used in media violence research, describing the strengths and weaknesses of each, noting the assessment methods used, and providing examples.",
author = "Wayne Warburton",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.4135/9781452299655.n11",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781452299655",
pages = "11--15",
editor = "Eastin, {Matthew S}",
booktitle = "Encyclopedia of media violence",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Warburton, W 2014, Aggression, definition and assessment of. in MS Eastin (ed.), Encyclopedia of media violence. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 11-15. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452299655.n11

Aggression, definition and assessment of. / Warburton, Wayne.

Encyclopedia of media violence. ed. / Matthew S Eastin. Thousand Oaks, California : SAGE Publications, 2014. p. 11-15.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionary/reference bookResearch

TY - CHAP

T1 - Aggression, definition and assessment of

AU - Warburton, Wayne

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - There is yet to be universal acceptance of any one definition of aggression; however, researchers in the field of psychology have tended to broadly agree that aggression is a behavior (which could be physical, verbal, relational/social, direct, or indirect) performed with the intent to hurt another who does not want to be hurt. Acts of aggression can be assessed in many ways, with laboratory experiments examining the willingness to hurt another in a controlled environment, questionnaire research asking about one’s own or another’s aggressive behavior, field research taking observational notes of aggression seen in everyday situations, and brain-scanning research examining changes to the brain associated with aggression. Crucially, each form of assessing aggression has unique strengths and weaknesses, leading to controversy about whether aggression has been truly measured in each case. The best evidence that something causes aggression comes from converging evidence from all types of assessment, each of which can overcome the shortcomings of another. This entry first examines how aggression is defined and categorized, and then examines these four types of aggression assessment that are commonly used in media violence research, describing the strengths and weaknesses of each, noting the assessment methods used, and providing examples.

AB - There is yet to be universal acceptance of any one definition of aggression; however, researchers in the field of psychology have tended to broadly agree that aggression is a behavior (which could be physical, verbal, relational/social, direct, or indirect) performed with the intent to hurt another who does not want to be hurt. Acts of aggression can be assessed in many ways, with laboratory experiments examining the willingness to hurt another in a controlled environment, questionnaire research asking about one’s own or another’s aggressive behavior, field research taking observational notes of aggression seen in everyday situations, and brain-scanning research examining changes to the brain associated with aggression. Crucially, each form of assessing aggression has unique strengths and weaknesses, leading to controversy about whether aggression has been truly measured in each case. The best evidence that something causes aggression comes from converging evidence from all types of assessment, each of which can overcome the shortcomings of another. This entry first examines how aggression is defined and categorized, and then examines these four types of aggression assessment that are commonly used in media violence research, describing the strengths and weaknesses of each, noting the assessment methods used, and providing examples.

U2 - 10.4135/9781452299655.n11

DO - 10.4135/9781452299655.n11

M3 - Entry for encyclopedia/dictionary/reference book

SN - 9781452299655

SP - 11

EP - 15

BT - Encyclopedia of media violence

A2 - Eastin, Matthew S

PB - SAGE Publications

CY - Thousand Oaks, California

ER -

Warburton W. Aggression, definition and assessment of. In Eastin MS, editor, Encyclopedia of media violence. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications. 2014. p. 11-15 https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452299655.n11