Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

AI ethics and the banality of evil

Payman Tajalli*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, I draw on Hannah Arendt’s notion of ‘banality of evil’ to argue that as long as AI systems are designed to follow codes of ethics or particular normative ethical theories chosen by us and programmed in them, they are Eichmanns destined to commit evil. Since intelligence alone is not sufficient for ethical decision making, rather than strive to program AI to determine the right ethical decision based on some ethical theory or criteria, AI should be concerned with avoiding making the wrong decisions, and this requires hardwiring the thinking activity as a prerequisite for decision making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)447-454
Number of pages8
JournalEthics and Information Technology
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021

Keywords

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Artificial Thinking
  • Banality of Evil

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'AI ethics and the banality of evil'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this