An ability approach to within-class curriculum differentiation using student response systems and Web 2.0 technologies: analysing teachers' responsiveness

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper examines teacher responsiveness to an ability approach of within-class curriculum differentiation using technology. Teachers were guided through a series of four workshops designed to enhance their capacity to differentiate the curriculum using Web 2.0 technologies and Student Response Systems. Anderson & Krathwohl's (2001) Taxonomy of Learning, Teaching and Assessing was used as a framework for the within-class ability differentiation. As a result of the project there was a discernable focusing of teachers' conceptualisations of differentiation and its value. There were also improvements in teachers' self-reported ability to differentiate the curriculum, ability to integrate technology into the classroom, and enjoyment of using technology. Considerable variance in teachers' capacity to differentiate according to student ability using technology was observed, indicating that a differentiated approach to supporting teachers' development in this area may be required.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages5-26
    Number of pages22
    JournalThemes in science and technology education
    Volume5
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    curriculum
    ability
    teacher
    student
    taxonomy
    classroom
    Teaching
    learning
    Values

    Keywords

    • differentiation
    • student response systems
    • Web 2.0
    • mixed-ability
    • revised Blooms

    Cite this

    @article{18955953fb5841c4aed4f8ae617b799b,
    title = "An ability approach to within-class curriculum differentiation using student response systems and Web 2.0 technologies: analysing teachers' responsiveness",
    abstract = "This paper examines teacher responsiveness to an ability approach of within-class curriculum differentiation using technology. Teachers were guided through a series of four workshops designed to enhance their capacity to differentiate the curriculum using Web 2.0 technologies and Student Response Systems. Anderson & Krathwohl's (2001) Taxonomy of Learning, Teaching and Assessing was used as a framework for the within-class ability differentiation. As a result of the project there was a discernable focusing of teachers' conceptualisations of differentiation and its value. There were also improvements in teachers' self-reported ability to differentiate the curriculum, ability to integrate technology into the classroom, and enjoyment of using technology. Considerable variance in teachers' capacity to differentiate according to student ability using technology was observed, indicating that a differentiated approach to supporting teachers' development in this area may be required.",
    keywords = "differentiation, student response systems, Web 2.0, mixed-ability, revised Blooms",
    author = "Matt Bower",
    year = "2012",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "5--26",
    journal = "Themes in science and technology education",
    issn = "1792-8788",
    publisher = "University of Ioannina",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - An ability approach to within-class curriculum differentiation using student response systems and Web 2.0 technologies

    T2 - Themes in science and technology education

    AU - Bower, Matt

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - This paper examines teacher responsiveness to an ability approach of within-class curriculum differentiation using technology. Teachers were guided through a series of four workshops designed to enhance their capacity to differentiate the curriculum using Web 2.0 technologies and Student Response Systems. Anderson & Krathwohl's (2001) Taxonomy of Learning, Teaching and Assessing was used as a framework for the within-class ability differentiation. As a result of the project there was a discernable focusing of teachers' conceptualisations of differentiation and its value. There were also improvements in teachers' self-reported ability to differentiate the curriculum, ability to integrate technology into the classroom, and enjoyment of using technology. Considerable variance in teachers' capacity to differentiate according to student ability using technology was observed, indicating that a differentiated approach to supporting teachers' development in this area may be required.

    AB - This paper examines teacher responsiveness to an ability approach of within-class curriculum differentiation using technology. Teachers were guided through a series of four workshops designed to enhance their capacity to differentiate the curriculum using Web 2.0 technologies and Student Response Systems. Anderson & Krathwohl's (2001) Taxonomy of Learning, Teaching and Assessing was used as a framework for the within-class ability differentiation. As a result of the project there was a discernable focusing of teachers' conceptualisations of differentiation and its value. There were also improvements in teachers' self-reported ability to differentiate the curriculum, ability to integrate technology into the classroom, and enjoyment of using technology. Considerable variance in teachers' capacity to differentiate according to student ability using technology was observed, indicating that a differentiated approach to supporting teachers' development in this area may be required.

    KW - differentiation

    KW - student response systems

    KW - Web 2.0

    KW - mixed-ability

    KW - revised Blooms

    M3 - Article

    VL - 5

    SP - 5

    EP - 26

    JO - Themes in science and technology education

    JF - Themes in science and technology education

    SN - 1792-8788

    IS - 2

    ER -