An analysis of young students’ thinking when completing basic coding tasks using Scratch Jnr. on the iPad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent government moves in many countries have seen coding included in school curricula, or promoted as part of computing, mathematics or science programmes. While these moves have generally been associated with a need to engage more young people in technology study, research has hinted at possible benefits from learning to program including fostering general thinking skills. However, little research has been carried out exploring these ideas. This study analysed data collected while 5- and 6-year-old students in a New Zealand primary school were using Scratch Jnr. to learn about basic shapes, as part of a numeracy topic. Analysis combinedBrennan and Resnick’s (2012) computational thinking skills framework and Krathwohl’s(2002) revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy to evaluate any role general thinking skills played in these students’ coding work. Results suggest including basic coding in primary curricula provides teachers with an effective means of exercising their students’ general and higher order thinking skills. They build on Brennan and Resnick’s (2012) framework by including conceptualization as an important element in students’ computational work and highlight the role of predictive thinking in debugging code. Findings support historical arguments that more needs to be done to investigate students’ cognitive processes when undertaking computational work.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)576-593
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Computer Assisted Learning
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • coding
  • collaborative
  • competencies
  • computational
  • learning
  • thinking

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An analysis of young students’ thinking when completing basic coding tasks using Scratch Jnr. on the iPad'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this