An approach for measuring confinement and assessing the influence of valley setting on river forms and processes

Kirstie A. Fryirs, Joseph M. Wheaton, Gary J. Brierley

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Valley setting and confinement (or lack thereof) are primary controls on river character and behaviour. Although there are various proxies for valley confinement, direct measures that quantify the nature and extent of confinement are generally lacking and/or inconsistently described. As such they do not lend themselves to consistent analysis over large spatial scales. Here we clearly define forms of confinement to aid in quantification of degrees of confinement. Types of margin that can induce confinement are differentiated as a valley margin, valley bottom margin, and/or anthropogenic margin. Such margins sometimes overlap and share the same location, and in other situations are separated, giving immediate clues as to the valley setting. We apply this framework to examples from Australia, United States and New Zealand, showing how this framework can be applied across the spectrum of river diversity. This method can help to inform interpretations of reach-scale river behaviour, highlighting the role of antecedent controls on contemporary forms and processes. Clear definitions of confinement are shown to support catchment-scale analysis of river patterns along longitudinal profiles, and appraisals of the geomorphic effectiveness of floods and sediment flux in catchments (e.g. process zone distribution, lateral sediment inputs and (dis)connectivity).

LanguageEnglish
Pages701-710
Number of pages10
JournalEarth Surface Processes and Landforms
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

river
valley
catchment
quantification
natural disaster
New Zealand
sediment
connectivity
aid
interpretation
measuring
lack
analysis

Keywords

  • antecedence
  • fluvial corridor
  • river planform
  • river structure and function
  • valley confinement

Cite this

@article{f28f6ca025e74413870f5d43a3aac4e3,
title = "An approach for measuring confinement and assessing the influence of valley setting on river forms and processes",
abstract = "Valley setting and confinement (or lack thereof) are primary controls on river character and behaviour. Although there are various proxies for valley confinement, direct measures that quantify the nature and extent of confinement are generally lacking and/or inconsistently described. As such they do not lend themselves to consistent analysis over large spatial scales. Here we clearly define forms of confinement to aid in quantification of degrees of confinement. Types of margin that can induce confinement are differentiated as a valley margin, valley bottom margin, and/or anthropogenic margin. Such margins sometimes overlap and share the same location, and in other situations are separated, giving immediate clues as to the valley setting. We apply this framework to examples from Australia, United States and New Zealand, showing how this framework can be applied across the spectrum of river diversity. This method can help to inform interpretations of reach-scale river behaviour, highlighting the role of antecedent controls on contemporary forms and processes. Clear definitions of confinement are shown to support catchment-scale analysis of river patterns along longitudinal profiles, and appraisals of the geomorphic effectiveness of floods and sediment flux in catchments (e.g. process zone distribution, lateral sediment inputs and (dis)connectivity).",
keywords = "antecedence, fluvial corridor, river planform, river structure and function, valley confinement",
author = "Fryirs, {Kirstie A.} and Wheaton, {Joseph M.} and Brierley, {Gary J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/esp.3893",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "701--710",
journal = "Earth Surface Processes and Landforms",
issn = "0197-9337",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "5",

}

An approach for measuring confinement and assessing the influence of valley setting on river forms and processes. / Fryirs, Kirstie A.; Wheaton, Joseph M.; Brierley, Gary J.

In: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Vol. 41, No. 5, 01.04.2016, p. 701-710.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An approach for measuring confinement and assessing the influence of valley setting on river forms and processes

AU - Fryirs, Kirstie A.

AU - Wheaton, Joseph M.

AU - Brierley, Gary J.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Valley setting and confinement (or lack thereof) are primary controls on river character and behaviour. Although there are various proxies for valley confinement, direct measures that quantify the nature and extent of confinement are generally lacking and/or inconsistently described. As such they do not lend themselves to consistent analysis over large spatial scales. Here we clearly define forms of confinement to aid in quantification of degrees of confinement. Types of margin that can induce confinement are differentiated as a valley margin, valley bottom margin, and/or anthropogenic margin. Such margins sometimes overlap and share the same location, and in other situations are separated, giving immediate clues as to the valley setting. We apply this framework to examples from Australia, United States and New Zealand, showing how this framework can be applied across the spectrum of river diversity. This method can help to inform interpretations of reach-scale river behaviour, highlighting the role of antecedent controls on contemporary forms and processes. Clear definitions of confinement are shown to support catchment-scale analysis of river patterns along longitudinal profiles, and appraisals of the geomorphic effectiveness of floods and sediment flux in catchments (e.g. process zone distribution, lateral sediment inputs and (dis)connectivity).

AB - Valley setting and confinement (or lack thereof) are primary controls on river character and behaviour. Although there are various proxies for valley confinement, direct measures that quantify the nature and extent of confinement are generally lacking and/or inconsistently described. As such they do not lend themselves to consistent analysis over large spatial scales. Here we clearly define forms of confinement to aid in quantification of degrees of confinement. Types of margin that can induce confinement are differentiated as a valley margin, valley bottom margin, and/or anthropogenic margin. Such margins sometimes overlap and share the same location, and in other situations are separated, giving immediate clues as to the valley setting. We apply this framework to examples from Australia, United States and New Zealand, showing how this framework can be applied across the spectrum of river diversity. This method can help to inform interpretations of reach-scale river behaviour, highlighting the role of antecedent controls on contemporary forms and processes. Clear definitions of confinement are shown to support catchment-scale analysis of river patterns along longitudinal profiles, and appraisals of the geomorphic effectiveness of floods and sediment flux in catchments (e.g. process zone distribution, lateral sediment inputs and (dis)connectivity).

KW - antecedence

KW - fluvial corridor

KW - river planform

KW - river structure and function

KW - valley confinement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956696290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/esp.3893

DO - 10.1002/esp.3893

M3 - Letter

VL - 41

SP - 701

EP - 710

JO - Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

T2 - Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

JF - Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

SN - 0197-9337

IS - 5

ER -