Abstract
This study examined three ways that perception of non-native phones may be uncategorized
relative to native (L 1) categories: focalized (predominantly similar to a single L 1 category),
clustered (similar to> 2 L 1 categories), and dispersed (not similar to any L 1 categories). In
an online study, Egyptian Arabic speakers residing in Egypt categorized and rated all
Australian English vowels. Evidence was found to support focalized, clustered, and
dispersed uncategorized assimilations. Second-language (L 2) category formation for
uncategorized assimilations is predicted to depend upon the degree of perceptual overlap
between the sets of L 1 categories listeners use in assimilating each phone within an L 2
contrast.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | EL1-EL5 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
Volume | 139 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |