TY - JOUR
T1 - An experimental investigation of the impact of the Lidcombe Program on early stuttering
AU - Harris, Vanessa
AU - Onslow, Mark
AU - Packman, Ann
AU - Harrison, Elisabeth
AU - Menzies, Ross
PY - 2002/9
Y1 - 2002/9
N2 - Preliminary Phase I and II trials for the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention have found favorable outcomes and that the treatment is safe. Although speech-language pathologists (SLPs) often need to intervene with pre-schoolers' early stuttering, many of these children will recover at some time in the future without such intervention. Consequently, they need to know whether the Lidcombe Program's effect on stuttering is greater than that of natural recovery. Participants were 23 pre-school children who were randomly assigned to either a control group or a treatment group that received the Lidcombe Program for 12 weeks. A repeated measures ANOVA showed no main effect on stuttering for the group (control/treatment), a significant main effect for the measurement occasion (at the start and at the end of the treatment period), and a significant interaction between group and measurement occasion. Stuttering in the treatment group reduced twice as much as in the control group. These results are interpreted to mean that the introduction of the Lidcombe Program has a positive impact on stuttering rate, which exceeds that attributable to natural recovery. Educational objectives: Readers will learn about and be able to describe: (1) how natural recovery can affect assessments of the effectiveness of treatments for early stuttering; (2) the relative effects of the Lidcombe Program and natural recovery on stuttering; and (3) the difference between the results of this study and those of uncontrolled clinical trials.
AB - Preliminary Phase I and II trials for the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention have found favorable outcomes and that the treatment is safe. Although speech-language pathologists (SLPs) often need to intervene with pre-schoolers' early stuttering, many of these children will recover at some time in the future without such intervention. Consequently, they need to know whether the Lidcombe Program's effect on stuttering is greater than that of natural recovery. Participants were 23 pre-school children who were randomly assigned to either a control group or a treatment group that received the Lidcombe Program for 12 weeks. A repeated measures ANOVA showed no main effect on stuttering for the group (control/treatment), a significant main effect for the measurement occasion (at the start and at the end of the treatment period), and a significant interaction between group and measurement occasion. Stuttering in the treatment group reduced twice as much as in the control group. These results are interpreted to mean that the introduction of the Lidcombe Program has a positive impact on stuttering rate, which exceeds that attributable to natural recovery. Educational objectives: Readers will learn about and be able to describe: (1) how natural recovery can affect assessments of the effectiveness of treatments for early stuttering; (2) the relative effects of the Lidcombe Program and natural recovery on stuttering; and (3) the difference between the results of this study and those of uncontrolled clinical trials.
KW - childhood stuttering
KW - lidcombe Program
KW - short-term effects
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036768357&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0094-730X(02)00127-4
DO - 10.1016/S0094-730X(02)00127-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 12371348
AN - SCOPUS:0036768357
SN - 0094-730X
VL - 27
SP - 203
EP - 214
JO - Journal of Fluency Disorders
JF - Journal of Fluency Disorders
IS - 3
ER -