An exploration of Australian psychologists' role in assessing women considering risk-reducing or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy

Lucy Braude, Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell, Jemma Gilchrist, Laura Kirsten, Ilona Juraskova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Given increasing rates of risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (CPM), and the potentially significant psychological sequelae of this irreversible procedure, health professionals (HPs) regularly refer patients to psychologists for pre-operative assessment and support. This is the first study to provide qualitative insights from HPs into the role of psychologists who are working with women considering RRM or CPM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 24 HPs (psychologists, surgeons, breast care nurses and genetic counsellors) experienced in treating patients before or after RRM/CPM completed semi-structured interviews (n = 15) or participated in a focus group (n = 10). Interviews were qualitatively analysed using Framework methods.

RESULTS: Qualitative analysis revealed four interconnected themes: (1) perceived patient motivation to undergo RRM/CPM; (2) HP reasons for psychologist referral; (3) role of the psychologist; and (4) value of psychologist involvement. The reported psychologist role included: mental health assessment, checking understanding of information, ensuring informed decision-making, preparation for the procedure, and management of post-surgical challenges.

CONCLUSION: Psychologists are perceived by HPs to have a key role in the multi-disciplinary care of patients considering RRM or CPM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-111
Number of pages7
JournalBreast
Volume32
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • risk-reducing mastectomy
  • contralateral prophylactic mastectomy
  • psychologist
  • assessment
  • qualitative

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An exploration of Australian psychologists' role in assessing women considering risk-reducing or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this