TY - JOUR
T1 - An integrative review of patient safety in studies on the care and safety of patients with communication disabilities in hospital
AU - Hemsley, Bronwyn
AU - Georgiou, Andrew
AU - Hill, Sophie
AU - Rollo, Megan
AU - Steel, Joanne
AU - Balandin, Susan
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Objective: To review the research literature on the experiences of patients with communication disabilities in hospital according to the Generic Model of patient safety. Methods: In 2014 and 2015, we searched four scientific databases for studies with an aim or result relevant to safety of hospital patients with communication disabilities. The review included 27 studies. Results: A range of adverse event types were outlined in qualitative research. Little detail was provided about contributing or protective factors for safety incidents in hospital for these patients or the impact of the incidents on the patient or organisations involved. Conclusion: Further research addressing the safety of patients with communication disabilities is needed. Sufficient detail is required to identify the nature, timing, and detection of incidents; factors that contribute to or prevent adverse events; and detail the impact of the adverse events. Practice implications: In order to provide safe and effective care to people with communication disabilities in hospital, a priority for health and disability services must be the design and evaluation of ecologically appropriate and evidence-based interventions to improve patient care, communication, and reduce the risk of costly and harmful patient safety incidents.
AB - Objective: To review the research literature on the experiences of patients with communication disabilities in hospital according to the Generic Model of patient safety. Methods: In 2014 and 2015, we searched four scientific databases for studies with an aim or result relevant to safety of hospital patients with communication disabilities. The review included 27 studies. Results: A range of adverse event types were outlined in qualitative research. Little detail was provided about contributing or protective factors for safety incidents in hospital for these patients or the impact of the incidents on the patient or organisations involved. Conclusion: Further research addressing the safety of patients with communication disabilities is needed. Sufficient detail is required to identify the nature, timing, and detection of incidents; factors that contribute to or prevent adverse events; and detail the impact of the adverse events. Practice implications: In order to provide safe and effective care to people with communication disabilities in hospital, a priority for health and disability services must be the design and evaluation of ecologically appropriate and evidence-based interventions to improve patient care, communication, and reduce the risk of costly and harmful patient safety incidents.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963984591&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1042635
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.022
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.022
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26566195
AN - SCOPUS:84963984591
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 99
SP - 501
EP - 511
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
IS - 4
ER -