Abstract
OBJECTIVE: IOI-HA response data are conventionally analysed assuming that the ordinal responses have interval-scale properties. This study critically considers this assumption and compares the conventional approach with a method using Item Response Theory (IRT).
DESIGN: A Bayesian IRT analysis model was implemented and applied to several IOI-HA data sets.
STUDY SAMPLE: Anonymised IOI-HA responses from 13273 adult users of one or two hearing aids in 11 data sets using the Australian English, Dutch, German and Swedish versions of the IOI-HA.
RESULTS: The raw ordinal responses to IOI-HA items do not represent values on interval scales. Using the conventional rating sum as an overall score introduces a scale error corresponding to about 10 - 15% of the true standard deviation in the population. Some interesting and statistically credible differences were demonstrated among the included data sets.
CONCLUSIONS: It is questionable to apply conventional statistical measures like mean, variance, t-tests, etc., on the raw IOI-HA ratings. It is recommended to apply only nonparametric statistical test methods for comparisons of IOI-HA results between groups. The scale error can sometimes cause incorrect conclusions when individual results are compared. The IRT approach is recommended for analysis of individual results.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 81-88 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | International Journal of Audiology |
Volume | 60 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 11 Sep 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright the Author(s) 2020. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- hearing aids
- IOI-HA
- Item Response Theory
- behavioural measures