Analysis of proximal bone margins in diabetic foot osteomyelitis by conventional culture, DNA sequencing and microscopy

Matthew Malone, Blaine G. Fritz, Karen Vickery, Saskia Schwarzer, Varun Sharma, Nathan Biggs, Michael Radzieta, Thomas T. Jeffries, Hugh G. Dickson, Slade O. Jensen, Thomas Bjarnsholt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Multiple approaches were employed to detect pathogens from bone margins associated with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis (DFO). Intra-operative bone specimens of 14 consecutive subjects with suspected DFO were collected over a six-month study period from Liverpool Hospital. Infected bone and a proximal bone margins presumed to be ‘clean/non-infected’ were collected. Bone material was subjected to conventional culture, DNA sequencing and microscopy. In total, eight of 14 (57%) proximal bone margins had no growth by conventional culture but were identified in all proximal bone specimens by DNA sequencing. Proximal margins had lower median total microbial counts than infected specimens, but these differences were not statistically significant. Pathogens identified by sequencing in infected specimens were identified in proximal margins and the microbiomes were similar (ANOSIM = 0.02, p = 0.59). Using a combination of SEM and/or PNA-FISH, we visualized the presence of microorganisms in infected bone specimens and their corresponding proximal margins of seven patients (50%) with DFO. We identify that bacteria can still reside in what seems to be proximal ‘clean’ margins. The significance and implications of clinical outcomes requires further analysis from a larger sample size that incorporates differences in surgical and post-operative approaches, correlating any outcomes back to culture-sequence findings.

LanguageEnglish
Pages660-670
Number of pages11
JournalAPMIS
Volume127
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Diabetic Foot
Osteomyelitis
DNA Sequence Analysis
Microscopy
Bone and Bones
Microbiota
Sample Size
Bacteria
Growth

Keywords

  • 16S rRNA
  • diabetic foot
  • Osteomyelitis
  • surgical management

Cite this

Malone, Matthew ; Fritz, Blaine G. ; Vickery, Karen ; Schwarzer, Saskia ; Sharma, Varun ; Biggs, Nathan ; Radzieta, Michael ; Jeffries, Thomas T. ; Dickson, Hugh G. ; Jensen, Slade O. ; Bjarnsholt, Thomas. / Analysis of proximal bone margins in diabetic foot osteomyelitis by conventional culture, DNA sequencing and microscopy. In: APMIS. 2019 ; Vol. 127, No. 10. pp. 660-670.
@article{6b3c9d0842c94b2792f1ae05e5d771f6,
title = "Analysis of proximal bone margins in diabetic foot osteomyelitis by conventional culture, DNA sequencing and microscopy",
abstract = "Multiple approaches were employed to detect pathogens from bone margins associated with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis (DFO). Intra-operative bone specimens of 14 consecutive subjects with suspected DFO were collected over a six-month study period from Liverpool Hospital. Infected bone and a proximal bone margins presumed to be ‘clean/non-infected’ were collected. Bone material was subjected to conventional culture, DNA sequencing and microscopy. In total, eight of 14 (57{\%}) proximal bone margins had no growth by conventional culture but were identified in all proximal bone specimens by DNA sequencing. Proximal margins had lower median total microbial counts than infected specimens, but these differences were not statistically significant. Pathogens identified by sequencing in infected specimens were identified in proximal margins and the microbiomes were similar (ANOSIM = 0.02, p = 0.59). Using a combination of SEM and/or PNA-FISH, we visualized the presence of microorganisms in infected bone specimens and their corresponding proximal margins of seven patients (50{\%}) with DFO. We identify that bacteria can still reside in what seems to be proximal ‘clean’ margins. The significance and implications of clinical outcomes requires further analysis from a larger sample size that incorporates differences in surgical and post-operative approaches, correlating any outcomes back to culture-sequence findings.",
keywords = "16S rRNA, diabetic foot, Osteomyelitis, surgical management",
author = "Matthew Malone and Fritz, {Blaine G.} and Karen Vickery and Saskia Schwarzer and Varun Sharma and Nathan Biggs and Michael Radzieta and Jeffries, {Thomas T.} and Dickson, {Hugh G.} and Jensen, {Slade O.} and Thomas Bjarnsholt",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/apm.12986",
language = "English",
volume = "127",
pages = "660--670",
journal = "APMIS",
issn = "0903-4641",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "10",

}

Malone, M, Fritz, BG, Vickery, K, Schwarzer, S, Sharma, V, Biggs, N, Radzieta, M, Jeffries, TT, Dickson, HG, Jensen, SO & Bjarnsholt, T 2019, 'Analysis of proximal bone margins in diabetic foot osteomyelitis by conventional culture, DNA sequencing and microscopy', APMIS, vol. 127, no. 10, pp. 660-670. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12986

Analysis of proximal bone margins in diabetic foot osteomyelitis by conventional culture, DNA sequencing and microscopy. / Malone, Matthew; Fritz, Blaine G.; Vickery, Karen; Schwarzer, Saskia; Sharma, Varun; Biggs, Nathan; Radzieta, Michael; Jeffries, Thomas T.; Dickson, Hugh G.; Jensen, Slade O.; Bjarnsholt, Thomas.

In: APMIS, Vol. 127, No. 10, 01.10.2019, p. 660-670.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of proximal bone margins in diabetic foot osteomyelitis by conventional culture, DNA sequencing and microscopy

AU - Malone, Matthew

AU - Fritz, Blaine G.

AU - Vickery, Karen

AU - Schwarzer, Saskia

AU - Sharma, Varun

AU - Biggs, Nathan

AU - Radzieta, Michael

AU - Jeffries, Thomas T.

AU - Dickson, Hugh G.

AU - Jensen, Slade O.

AU - Bjarnsholt, Thomas

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Multiple approaches were employed to detect pathogens from bone margins associated with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis (DFO). Intra-operative bone specimens of 14 consecutive subjects with suspected DFO were collected over a six-month study period from Liverpool Hospital. Infected bone and a proximal bone margins presumed to be ‘clean/non-infected’ were collected. Bone material was subjected to conventional culture, DNA sequencing and microscopy. In total, eight of 14 (57%) proximal bone margins had no growth by conventional culture but were identified in all proximal bone specimens by DNA sequencing. Proximal margins had lower median total microbial counts than infected specimens, but these differences were not statistically significant. Pathogens identified by sequencing in infected specimens were identified in proximal margins and the microbiomes were similar (ANOSIM = 0.02, p = 0.59). Using a combination of SEM and/or PNA-FISH, we visualized the presence of microorganisms in infected bone specimens and their corresponding proximal margins of seven patients (50%) with DFO. We identify that bacteria can still reside in what seems to be proximal ‘clean’ margins. The significance and implications of clinical outcomes requires further analysis from a larger sample size that incorporates differences in surgical and post-operative approaches, correlating any outcomes back to culture-sequence findings.

AB - Multiple approaches were employed to detect pathogens from bone margins associated with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis (DFO). Intra-operative bone specimens of 14 consecutive subjects with suspected DFO were collected over a six-month study period from Liverpool Hospital. Infected bone and a proximal bone margins presumed to be ‘clean/non-infected’ were collected. Bone material was subjected to conventional culture, DNA sequencing and microscopy. In total, eight of 14 (57%) proximal bone margins had no growth by conventional culture but were identified in all proximal bone specimens by DNA sequencing. Proximal margins had lower median total microbial counts than infected specimens, but these differences were not statistically significant. Pathogens identified by sequencing in infected specimens were identified in proximal margins and the microbiomes were similar (ANOSIM = 0.02, p = 0.59). Using a combination of SEM and/or PNA-FISH, we visualized the presence of microorganisms in infected bone specimens and their corresponding proximal margins of seven patients (50%) with DFO. We identify that bacteria can still reside in what seems to be proximal ‘clean’ margins. The significance and implications of clinical outcomes requires further analysis from a larger sample size that incorporates differences in surgical and post-operative approaches, correlating any outcomes back to culture-sequence findings.

KW - 16S rRNA

KW - diabetic foot

KW - Osteomyelitis

KW - surgical management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071305654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/apm.12986

DO - 10.1111/apm.12986

M3 - Article

VL - 127

SP - 660

EP - 670

JO - APMIS

T2 - APMIS

JF - APMIS

SN - 0903-4641

IS - 10

ER -