Analytical guidelines for co-fractionation mass spectrometry obtained through global profiling of gold standard Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein complexes

Chi Nam Ignatius Pang, Sara Ballouz, Daniel Weissberger, Loïc M. Thibaut, Joshua J. Hamey, Jesse Gillis, Marc R. Wilkins, Gene Hart-Smith*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Co-fractionation MS (CF-MS) is a technique with potential to characterize endogenous and unmanipulated protein complexes on an unprecedented scale. However this potential has been offset by a lack of guidelines for best-practice CF-MS data collection and analysis. To obtain such guidelines, this study thoroughly evaluates novel and published Saccharomyces cerevisiae CF-MS data sets using very high proteome coverage libraries of yeast gold standard complexes. A new method for identifying gold standard complexes in CF-MS data, Reference Complex Profiling, and the Extending 'Guilt-by-Association' by Degree (EGAD) R package are used for these evaluations, which are verified with concurrent analyses of published human data. By evaluating data collection designs, which involve fractionation of cell lysates, it is found that near-maximum recall of complexes can be achieved with fewer samples than published studies. Distributing sample collection across orthogonal fractionation methods, rather than a single high resolution data set, leads to particularly efficient recall. By evaluating 17 different similarity scoring metrics, which are central to CF-MS data analysis, it is found that two metrics rarely used in past CF-MS studies - Spearman and Kendall correlations - and the recently introduced Co-apex metric frequently maximize recall, whereas a popular metric-Euclidean distance-delivers poor recall. The common practice of integrating external genomic data into CF-MS data analysis is also evaluated, revealing that this practice may improve the precision and recall of known complexes but is generally unsuitable for predicting novel complexes in model organisms. If studying nonmodel organisms using orthologous genomic data, it is found that particular subsets of fractionation profiles (e.g. the lowest abundance quartile) should be excluded to minimize false discovery. These assessments are summarized in a series of universally applicable guidelines for precise, sensitive and efficient CF-MS studies of known complexes, and effective predictions of novel complexes for orthogonal experimental validation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1876-1895
Number of pages20
JournalMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP
Volume19
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2020

Keywords

  • Bioinformatics
  • Chromatography
  • co-fractionation mass spectrometry
  • Protein complex analysis
  • protein complexes
  • protein correlation profiling
  • protein-protein interactions
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae
  • Yeast*

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Analytical guidelines for co-fractionation mass spectrometry obtained through global profiling of gold standard <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae </i>protein complexes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this