La géographie électorale anglo-américaine

l'émergence d'une sous-discipline

Translated title of the contribution: Anglo-American electoral geography: The emergence of a sub-discipline

Charles J. Pattie*, Ron J. Johnston

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)


In the 1950s and 1960s, the dominant view in the Anglo-American democracies was that electoral geography was unimportant because improvements in mass communications had produced a national electorate (Agnew, 1987; Rose and McAllister, 1990). Although a geography of the vote was recognised (party support varied from place to place), there was, it was claimed, no geography of electoral behaviour. Individuals in the same social groups would vote the same way no matter where they lived. Electoral geography was an outcome of social geography. But the orthodoxy since the 1980s has shifted back to a recognition of geography's electoral role. Voters, recent research suggests, are influenced not just by who they are (their social class, party affiliation and so on) but also by where they are - by what is happening around them.

Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)443-452
Number of pages10
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2003


  • Behaviour
  • Ecological analysis
  • Electoral cartography
  • Electoral geography

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Anglo-American electoral geography: The emergence of a sub-discipline'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this