Anodic polarity minimizes facial nerve stimulation as a side effect of cochlear implantation

Wiebke S. Konerding, Peter Baumhoff, Andrej Kral

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
45 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

One severe side effect of the use of cochlear implants (CI) is coincidental facial nerve stimulation (FNS). Clinical methods to alleviate FNS range from the reprogramming of processor settings to revision surgery. We systematically assessed different changes in CI stimulation modes that have been discussed in the literature as "rescue factors" from FNS: electrode configuration (broad to focused), pulse shape (symmetric biphasic to pseudo-monophasic), and pulse polarity (cathodic to anodic). An FNS was assessed, based on electrophysiological thresholds, in 204 electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) input/output functions recorded from 33 ears of 26 guinea pigs. The stimulation level difference between auditory nerve eCAP threshold and FNS threshold was expressed as the eCAP-to-FNS offset. Coincidental FNS occurred in all animals and in 45% of all recordings. A change from monopolar to focused (bipolar, tripolar) configurations minimized FNS. The Euclidean distance between the CI contacts and the facial nerve explained no more than 33% of the variance in FNS thresholds. For both the FNS threshold and the eCAP-to-FNS offset, the change from cathodic to anodic pulse polarity significantly reduced FNS and permitted a gain of 14-71% of the dynamic range of the eCAP response. This "anodic rescue effect" was stronger for pseudo-monophasic pulses as compared to the symmetric biphasic pulse shape. These results provide possible mechanisms underlying recent clinical interventions to alleviate FNS. The "anodic-rescue effect" may offer a non-invasive therapeutic option for FNS in human CI users that should be tested clinically, preferably in combination with current-focusing methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-46
Number of pages16
JournalJARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
Volume24
Issue number1
Early online date2 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2022. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Cochlear implant
  • Electrically evoked compound action potential
  • Facial nerve stimulation
  • Polarity effect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anodic polarity minimizes facial nerve stimulation as a side effect of cochlear implantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this