Abstract
This chapter canvasses two master intuitions about knowledge: the ability intuition and the anti-luck intuition. It argues that a robust anti-luck epistemology, which takes the antiluck intuition as central, cannot accommodate the ability intuition, and that a robust virtue epistemology which takes the ability intuition as central cannot accommodate the anti-luck intuition. It is suggested that the proper moral to be extracted from this impasse is that we need an anti-luck virtue epistemology - a theory of knowledge which incorporates two separate epistemic conditions designed to accommodate each of the two master intuitions about knowledge. Such a view can accommodate a range of key examples of interest to epistemologists. A genealogical diagnosis of the structure of knowledge is offered which supports this proposal. Anti-luck virtue epistemology can adequately respond to those versions of the value problem for knowledge which do not trade on the intuition that knowledge is finally valuable.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The Nature and Value of Knowledge: Three Investigations |
Editors | Duncan Pritchard, Alan Millar, Adrian Haddock |
Place of Publication | Oxford |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Pages | 1-24 |
Number of pages | 24 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191723360 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780199586264 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sep 2010 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Anti-luck epistemology
- Anti-luck virtue epistemology
- Cognitive ability
- Epistemic luck
- Epistemic value
- Knowledge
- Virtue epistemology