Abstract
It is argued that the debate regarding radical scepticism needs to be conducted in the light of a value-theoretic methodological constraint. It is further shown that such a methodological constraint raises some uncomfortable problems for the main anti-sceptical proposals in the literature.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 419-428 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Iris : European journal of philosophy and public debate |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |