TY - JOUR
T1 - Antidepressant therapy (imipramine and citalopram) for irritable bowel syndrome
T2 - a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
AU - Talley, Nicholas J.
AU - Kellow, John E.
AU - Boyce, Philip
AU - Tennant, Christopher
AU - Huskic, Sandy
AU - Jones, Michael
PY - 2008/1
Y1 - 2008/1
N2 - Background: The efficacy of antidepressants in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is controversial. No trials have directly compared a tricyclic with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Our aim was to determine whether imipramine and citalopram are efficacious in IBS. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group pilot trial with imipramine (50 mg) and citalopram (40 mg). Results: Of 51 IBS patients randomized, baseline characteristics were comparable among the treatment arms; the majority was diarrhea-predominant. Adequate relief of IBS symptoms (primary endpoint) was similar for each treatment arm. Improvements in bowel symptom severity rating for interference (P = 0.05) and distress (P = 0.02) were greater with imipramine versus placebo, but improvements in abdominal pain were not. There was a greater improvement in depression score (P = 0.08) and in the SF-36 Mental Component Score (P = 0.07), with imipramine. Citalopram was not superior to placebo. Approximately 20% of the variance in scores was explained by treatment differences for abdominal pain, bowel symptom severity disability, depression and the mental component of the SF-36. Conclusion: Neither imipramine nor citalopram significantly improved global IBS endpoints over placebo.
AB - Background: The efficacy of antidepressants in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is controversial. No trials have directly compared a tricyclic with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Our aim was to determine whether imipramine and citalopram are efficacious in IBS. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group pilot trial with imipramine (50 mg) and citalopram (40 mg). Results: Of 51 IBS patients randomized, baseline characteristics were comparable among the treatment arms; the majority was diarrhea-predominant. Adequate relief of IBS symptoms (primary endpoint) was similar for each treatment arm. Improvements in bowel symptom severity rating for interference (P = 0.05) and distress (P = 0.02) were greater with imipramine versus placebo, but improvements in abdominal pain were not. There was a greater improvement in depression score (P = 0.08) and in the SF-36 Mental Component Score (P = 0.07), with imipramine. Citalopram was not superior to placebo. Approximately 20% of the variance in scores was explained by treatment differences for abdominal pain, bowel symptom severity disability, depression and the mental component of the SF-36. Conclusion: Neither imipramine nor citalopram significantly improved global IBS endpoints over placebo.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37249086163&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10620-007-9830-4
DO - 10.1007/s10620-007-9830-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 17503182
AN - SCOPUS:37249086163
VL - 53
SP - 108
EP - 115
JO - Digestive Diseases and Sciences
JF - Digestive Diseases and Sciences
SN - 0163-2116
IS - 1
ER -