Antipredator tactics: a kin-selection benefit for defensive spines in coral catfish?

Richard Shine*, Vinay Udyawer, Claire Goiran

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    89 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Morphological features that impair a predator's ability to consume a prey item may benefit individual prey; but what of features that prolong prey-handling but do not enhance prey survival? For example, a striped eel catfish Plotosus lineatus will be fatally envenomated if struck by its specialist predator, the greater sea snake Hydrophis major. Nonetheless, the catfish typically erects long, toxic pectoral and dorsal spines that increase prey-handling times for the snake by around eightfold. Because the catfish travel in swarms of closely-related individuals, the delay enforced by spines may enable the victim's swarm-mates to disperse before the snake is able to search for another meal. In keeping with that hypothesis, defensive spines tend to be longer in catfish from regions where the greater sea snake occurs, than from areas where the snake does not occur.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)240-247
    Number of pages8
    JournalOikos
    Volume130
    Issue number2
    Early online date23 Oct 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021

    Keywords

    • antipredator
    • hydrophiine
    • marine
    • olive-headed sea snake
    • predator–prey

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Antipredator tactics: a kin-selection benefit for defensive spines in coral catfish?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this