Antipredator tactics of amphibious sea-snakes (Serpentes, Laticaudidae)

Richard Shine*, Xavier Bonnet, Harold G. Cogger

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because the antipredator behavior that an animal displays depends upon the context in which it encounters the predator, apparent interspecific differences in antipredator tactics may result from ecological rather than behavioral differences among taxa. We approached 127 free-ranging laticaudid sea-snakes on small islands in Noumea Lagoon, New Caledonia, prodded the animals midbody, and recorded their responses. One species (Laticauda colubrina) usually remained immobile (relying on crypsis) whereas another (L. laticaudata) generally fled. However, multivariate analysis shows that the two species actually responded in very similar ways to any given stimulus; the species differed overall because colubrina was generally encountered on land during the day whereas laticaudata was more often encountered in the ocean at night. Thus, apparent interspecific differences in antipredator responses were secondary consequences of interspecific differences in the times and places that predators were encountered. Snakes were more likely to flee rather than remain immobile when rapid locomotion was possible (i.e. juveniles rather than adults; in water rather than on land) and pursuit by a predator was difficult (i.e. at night rather than during the day). These patterns suggest that snakes adjust their antipredator tactics in ways that maximize the chances of surviving the encounter, although the remarkable docility of these highly venomous snakes remains puzzling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)533-542
Number of pages10
JournalEthology
Volume109
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antipredator tactics of amphibious sea-snakes (Serpentes, Laticaudidae)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this