Abstract
After the National Anti-Vivisection Society had held the status of ‘charitable
institution’ for more than five decades, in 1948 the House of Lords held it was
not a charitable institution because its objectives were political, and also
because any benefit to the public that flowed from abolishing vivisection was
outweighed by the cost to society, in terms of medical research that was of
benefit to mankind. In light of the historical background of both the Society and
more recent developments in charity law in Australia, the question is asked
whether the decision of the House of Lords still stands as good law today.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 519-539 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Sydney Law Review |
Volume | 35 |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |