Aphasia and Open Format Other-Initiation of Repair: Solving Complex Trouble in Conversation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

If a listener uses a token like huh, what, sorry (an “open format other-initiation of repair”) to signal a problem in what the previous speaker has just said, it implies that it is the speaker who is responsible and that they should repair their own talk. But if the speaker is someone with aphasia, they may experience difficulty carrying out self-repair without support from their conversation partners. This article demonstrates how generating repair solutions to open format repair initiations can indeed be difficult for people with aphasia. It then explores how simplifying the design of the troublesome turn can reduce the linguistic burden on speakers with aphasia and involve conversation partners in resolving the trouble. This study adds to knowledge about the effects of aphasia on interaction, open formats, and the interface between action formation and turn design. Data are in Australian English.

LanguageEnglish
Pages111-127
Number of pages17
JournalResearch on Language and Social Interaction
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Aphasia
speech disorder
Repair
conversation
Linguistics
listener
linguistics
interaction
experience

Cite this

@article{4e67e2ded0404bfca84e5f4de2994a07,
title = "Aphasia and Open Format Other-Initiation of Repair: Solving Complex Trouble in Conversation",
abstract = "If a listener uses a token like huh, what, sorry (an “open format other-initiation of repair”) to signal a problem in what the previous speaker has just said, it implies that it is the speaker who is responsible and that they should repair their own talk. But if the speaker is someone with aphasia, they may experience difficulty carrying out self-repair without support from their conversation partners. This article demonstrates how generating repair solutions to open format repair initiations can indeed be difficult for people with aphasia. It then explores how simplifying the design of the troublesome turn can reduce the linguistic burden on speakers with aphasia and involve conversation partners in resolving the trouble. This study adds to knowledge about the effects of aphasia on interaction, open formats, and the interface between action formation and turn design. Data are in Australian English.",
author = "Scott Barnes",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/08351813.2016.1164399",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "111--127",
journal = "Research on Language and Social Interaction",
issn = "0835-1813",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
number = "2",

}

Aphasia and Open Format Other-Initiation of Repair : Solving Complex Trouble in Conversation. / Barnes, Scott.

In: Research on Language and Social Interaction, Vol. 49, No. 2, 02.04.2016, p. 111-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aphasia and Open Format Other-Initiation of Repair

T2 - Research on Language and Social Interaction

AU - Barnes, Scott

PY - 2016/4/2

Y1 - 2016/4/2

N2 - If a listener uses a token like huh, what, sorry (an “open format other-initiation of repair”) to signal a problem in what the previous speaker has just said, it implies that it is the speaker who is responsible and that they should repair their own talk. But if the speaker is someone with aphasia, they may experience difficulty carrying out self-repair without support from their conversation partners. This article demonstrates how generating repair solutions to open format repair initiations can indeed be difficult for people with aphasia. It then explores how simplifying the design of the troublesome turn can reduce the linguistic burden on speakers with aphasia and involve conversation partners in resolving the trouble. This study adds to knowledge about the effects of aphasia on interaction, open formats, and the interface between action formation and turn design. Data are in Australian English.

AB - If a listener uses a token like huh, what, sorry (an “open format other-initiation of repair”) to signal a problem in what the previous speaker has just said, it implies that it is the speaker who is responsible and that they should repair their own talk. But if the speaker is someone with aphasia, they may experience difficulty carrying out self-repair without support from their conversation partners. This article demonstrates how generating repair solutions to open format repair initiations can indeed be difficult for people with aphasia. It then explores how simplifying the design of the troublesome turn can reduce the linguistic burden on speakers with aphasia and involve conversation partners in resolving the trouble. This study adds to knowledge about the effects of aphasia on interaction, open formats, and the interface between action formation and turn design. Data are in Australian English.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969249008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08351813.2016.1164399

DO - 10.1080/08351813.2016.1164399

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 111

EP - 127

JO - Research on Language and Social Interaction

JF - Research on Language and Social Interaction

SN - 0835-1813

IS - 2

ER -