Apples, oranges, and the burden of proof - Putting media violence findings into context: A comment on Elson and Ferguson (2013)

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this comment on Elson and Ferguson (2013), areas of agreement are noted in terms of the need to thoroughly and scientifically document the boundary conditions under which violent video games most impact players. However it is argued, in contrast to Elson and Ferguson, that violent media generally (and violent video games specifically) can and do increase the likelihood of aggressive behavior and desensitization to violence, and are linked to increases in aggressive attitudes and beliefs. It is also argued that research findings demonstrating these violent video game effects must be considered in terms of both the known impacts of other types of media on human thoughts and behavior, and well-documented psychological processes that have been empirically demonstrated to underlie the acquisition of all types of social behavior, not just aggression. To this end, evidence is provided that other types of media such as advertising are shown to clearly impact human psychology, and psychological mechanisms that potentially underlie media violence effects are discussed. It is further noted that there are no clearly evident reasons as to why violent video games should impact thoughts and behavior less than other media or be subject to different psychological processes. When the research evidence is considered in these contexts, it is concluded that the above-mentioned impacts of violent media exposure on human thought and behavior (including those of violent digital games) are demonstrated to two levels of proof - on the balance of probabilities and beyond reasonable doubt.

LanguageEnglish
Pages60-67
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Psychologist
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Video Games
Malus
Violence
Psychology
Social Behavior
Aggression
Research
Burden of Proof
Media Violence
Psychological

Cite this

@article{f7aa934154b54f05a397bbe6f8e0ad9d,
title = "Apples, oranges, and the burden of proof - Putting media violence findings into context: A comment on Elson and Ferguson (2013)",
abstract = "In this comment on Elson and Ferguson (2013), areas of agreement are noted in terms of the need to thoroughly and scientifically document the boundary conditions under which violent video games most impact players. However it is argued, in contrast to Elson and Ferguson, that violent media generally (and violent video games specifically) can and do increase the likelihood of aggressive behavior and desensitization to violence, and are linked to increases in aggressive attitudes and beliefs. It is also argued that research findings demonstrating these violent video game effects must be considered in terms of both the known impacts of other types of media on human thoughts and behavior, and well-documented psychological processes that have been empirically demonstrated to underlie the acquisition of all types of social behavior, not just aggression. To this end, evidence is provided that other types of media such as advertising are shown to clearly impact human psychology, and psychological mechanisms that potentially underlie media violence effects are discussed. It is further noted that there are no clearly evident reasons as to why violent video games should impact thoughts and behavior less than other media or be subject to different psychological processes. When the research evidence is considered in these contexts, it is concluded that the above-mentioned impacts of violent media exposure on human thought and behavior (including those of violent digital games) are demonstrated to two levels of proof - on the balance of probabilities and beyond reasonable doubt.",
author = "Wayne Warburton",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1027/1016-9040/a000166",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "60--67",
journal = "European Psychologist",
issn = "1016-9040",
publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",
number = "1",

}

Apples, oranges, and the burden of proof - Putting media violence findings into context : A comment on Elson and Ferguson (2013). / Warburton, Wayne.

In: European Psychologist, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2014, p. 60-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Apples, oranges, and the burden of proof - Putting media violence findings into context

T2 - European Psychologist

AU - Warburton, Wayne

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In this comment on Elson and Ferguson (2013), areas of agreement are noted in terms of the need to thoroughly and scientifically document the boundary conditions under which violent video games most impact players. However it is argued, in contrast to Elson and Ferguson, that violent media generally (and violent video games specifically) can and do increase the likelihood of aggressive behavior and desensitization to violence, and are linked to increases in aggressive attitudes and beliefs. It is also argued that research findings demonstrating these violent video game effects must be considered in terms of both the known impacts of other types of media on human thoughts and behavior, and well-documented psychological processes that have been empirically demonstrated to underlie the acquisition of all types of social behavior, not just aggression. To this end, evidence is provided that other types of media such as advertising are shown to clearly impact human psychology, and psychological mechanisms that potentially underlie media violence effects are discussed. It is further noted that there are no clearly evident reasons as to why violent video games should impact thoughts and behavior less than other media or be subject to different psychological processes. When the research evidence is considered in these contexts, it is concluded that the above-mentioned impacts of violent media exposure on human thought and behavior (including those of violent digital games) are demonstrated to two levels of proof - on the balance of probabilities and beyond reasonable doubt.

AB - In this comment on Elson and Ferguson (2013), areas of agreement are noted in terms of the need to thoroughly and scientifically document the boundary conditions under which violent video games most impact players. However it is argued, in contrast to Elson and Ferguson, that violent media generally (and violent video games specifically) can and do increase the likelihood of aggressive behavior and desensitization to violence, and are linked to increases in aggressive attitudes and beliefs. It is also argued that research findings demonstrating these violent video game effects must be considered in terms of both the known impacts of other types of media on human thoughts and behavior, and well-documented psychological processes that have been empirically demonstrated to underlie the acquisition of all types of social behavior, not just aggression. To this end, evidence is provided that other types of media such as advertising are shown to clearly impact human psychology, and psychological mechanisms that potentially underlie media violence effects are discussed. It is further noted that there are no clearly evident reasons as to why violent video games should impact thoughts and behavior less than other media or be subject to different psychological processes. When the research evidence is considered in these contexts, it is concluded that the above-mentioned impacts of violent media exposure on human thought and behavior (including those of violent digital games) are demonstrated to two levels of proof - on the balance of probabilities and beyond reasonable doubt.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897767964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1027/1016-9040/a000166

DO - 10.1027/1016-9040/a000166

M3 - Review article

VL - 19

SP - 60

EP - 67

JO - European Psychologist

JF - European Psychologist

SN - 1016-9040

IS - 1

ER -