Are all fathers in child protection families uncommitted, uninvolved and unable to change?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Although much is known about 'parents' in child protection families, very little research has specifically examined fathers in these families. The scant extant research indicates that child welfare workers in many countries tend to have negative stereotypes of these men, assuming them to be uncommitted and uninvolved parents, and unable to cease drug use. The present study sought to add to the knowledge about fathers in child protection families, and to investigate whether or not there was support for these negative stereotypes within this sample. Study participants were 35 fathers associated with a parenting program in Sydney, Australia, who completed quantitative demographic, family and psychological measures. In addition, a subset of nine participants provided life story qualitative data. Findings from both the quantitative and qualitative data indicated that, in contrast to the negative stereotypes, these fathers were typically committed and involved parents who were no longer abusing substances. They experienced considerable psychological distress as a result of having their children removed, and fathers with custody of their children reported the best psychological well-being. Study participants were shown to have similar demographic, family and psychological profiles to those found in child protection populations elsewhere in Australia and in other countries, suggesting that these findings may have wider relevance. This study highlights the importance of child welfare workers engaging with and accurately assessing fathers without preconceived assumptions, as it is possible that some fathers are viable placement options for at-risk children.

LanguageEnglish
Pages83-94
Number of pages12
JournalChildren and Youth Services Review
Volume41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

child protection
Fathers
father
Psychology
stereotype
welfare worker
parents
Parents
Child Welfare
child welfare
Child Custody
Demography
Parenting
child custody
Research
drug use
well-being
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Population

Cite this

@article{7f0ce73d275b48428b5990ef2f265dbc,
title = "Are all fathers in child protection families uncommitted, uninvolved and unable to change?",
abstract = "Although much is known about 'parents' in child protection families, very little research has specifically examined fathers in these families. The scant extant research indicates that child welfare workers in many countries tend to have negative stereotypes of these men, assuming them to be uncommitted and uninvolved parents, and unable to cease drug use. The present study sought to add to the knowledge about fathers in child protection families, and to investigate whether or not there was support for these negative stereotypes within this sample. Study participants were 35 fathers associated with a parenting program in Sydney, Australia, who completed quantitative demographic, family and psychological measures. In addition, a subset of nine participants provided life story qualitative data. Findings from both the quantitative and qualitative data indicated that, in contrast to the negative stereotypes, these fathers were typically committed and involved parents who were no longer abusing substances. They experienced considerable psychological distress as a result of having their children removed, and fathers with custody of their children reported the best psychological well-being. Study participants were shown to have similar demographic, family and psychological profiles to those found in child protection populations elsewhere in Australia and in other countries, suggesting that these findings may have wider relevance. This study highlights the importance of child welfare workers engaging with and accurately assessing fathers without preconceived assumptions, as it is possible that some fathers are viable placement options for at-risk children.",
author = "Lee Zanoni and Wayne Warburton and Kay Bussey and Anne McMaugh",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.014",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "83--94",
journal = "Children and Youth Services Review",
issn = "0190-7409",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Are all fathers in child protection families uncommitted, uninvolved and unable to change? / Zanoni, Lee; Warburton, Wayne; Bussey, Kay; McMaugh, Anne.

In: Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 41, 2014, p. 83-94.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are all fathers in child protection families uncommitted, uninvolved and unable to change?

AU - Zanoni, Lee

AU - Warburton, Wayne

AU - Bussey, Kay

AU - McMaugh, Anne

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Although much is known about 'parents' in child protection families, very little research has specifically examined fathers in these families. The scant extant research indicates that child welfare workers in many countries tend to have negative stereotypes of these men, assuming them to be uncommitted and uninvolved parents, and unable to cease drug use. The present study sought to add to the knowledge about fathers in child protection families, and to investigate whether or not there was support for these negative stereotypes within this sample. Study participants were 35 fathers associated with a parenting program in Sydney, Australia, who completed quantitative demographic, family and psychological measures. In addition, a subset of nine participants provided life story qualitative data. Findings from both the quantitative and qualitative data indicated that, in contrast to the negative stereotypes, these fathers were typically committed and involved parents who were no longer abusing substances. They experienced considerable psychological distress as a result of having their children removed, and fathers with custody of their children reported the best psychological well-being. Study participants were shown to have similar demographic, family and psychological profiles to those found in child protection populations elsewhere in Australia and in other countries, suggesting that these findings may have wider relevance. This study highlights the importance of child welfare workers engaging with and accurately assessing fathers without preconceived assumptions, as it is possible that some fathers are viable placement options for at-risk children.

AB - Although much is known about 'parents' in child protection families, very little research has specifically examined fathers in these families. The scant extant research indicates that child welfare workers in many countries tend to have negative stereotypes of these men, assuming them to be uncommitted and uninvolved parents, and unable to cease drug use. The present study sought to add to the knowledge about fathers in child protection families, and to investigate whether or not there was support for these negative stereotypes within this sample. Study participants were 35 fathers associated with a parenting program in Sydney, Australia, who completed quantitative demographic, family and psychological measures. In addition, a subset of nine participants provided life story qualitative data. Findings from both the quantitative and qualitative data indicated that, in contrast to the negative stereotypes, these fathers were typically committed and involved parents who were no longer abusing substances. They experienced considerable psychological distress as a result of having their children removed, and fathers with custody of their children reported the best psychological well-being. Study participants were shown to have similar demographic, family and psychological profiles to those found in child protection populations elsewhere in Australia and in other countries, suggesting that these findings may have wider relevance. This study highlights the importance of child welfare workers engaging with and accurately assessing fathers without preconceived assumptions, as it is possible that some fathers are viable placement options for at-risk children.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898906229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.014

DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.014

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 83

EP - 94

JO - Children and Youth Services Review

T2 - Children and Youth Services Review

JF - Children and Youth Services Review

SN - 0190-7409

ER -