Are interactive decision AIDS better than passive decision AIDS? A comparison with implications for information providers on the internet

Erik L. Olson, Robert E. Widing

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

While much has been made of the ocean of information available on the Internet, much less emphasis has been placed on how Web surfers might actually be able to process it. This article compares an interactive (user-inputted attribute importance weights) linear computer-assisted decision aid (CADA) format with three passive CADA formats in two studies. The decision environments for these tests are difficult, involving 20 to 30 brands rated on 6 attributes, one of which is negatively correlated with the others. Because the Linear CADA rank order is based on user-inputted attribute weights, it is expected to be more in concordance with the users preference and hence is predicted to offer higher decision quality and be better liked than the passive formats. Contrary to expectations, however, a passive Equal Weight format performed as well or better than the Linear format on all objective and subjective comparison criteria, while the other two passive formats were not significantly worse on several decision quality criteria. The implications of these findings for information providers on the Internet are also discussed.

LanguageEnglish
Pages22-33
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Interactive Marketing
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2002

Fingerprint

World Wide Web
Decision aids
Decision quality
User preferences
Attribute importance
Concordance

Cite this

@article{736a3fd5f89d4272904133bf28052253,
title = "Are interactive decision AIDS better than passive decision AIDS? A comparison with implications for information providers on the internet",
abstract = "While much has been made of the ocean of information available on the Internet, much less emphasis has been placed on how Web surfers might actually be able to process it. This article compares an interactive (user-inputted attribute importance weights) linear computer-assisted decision aid (CADA) format with three passive CADA formats in two studies. The decision environments for these tests are difficult, involving 20 to 30 brands rated on 6 attributes, one of which is negatively correlated with the others. Because the Linear CADA rank order is based on user-inputted attribute weights, it is expected to be more in concordance with the users preference and hence is predicted to offer higher decision quality and be better liked than the passive formats. Contrary to expectations, however, a passive Equal Weight format performed as well or better than the Linear format on all objective and subjective comparison criteria, while the other two passive formats were not significantly worse on several decision quality criteria. The implications of these findings for information providers on the Internet are also discussed.",
author = "Olson, {Erik L.} and Widing, {Robert E.}",
year = "2002",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/dir.10007",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "22--33",
journal = "Journal of Interactive Marketing",
issn = "1094-9968",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Are interactive decision AIDS better than passive decision AIDS? A comparison with implications for information providers on the internet. / Olson, Erik L.; Widing, Robert E.

In: Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 2, 03.2002, p. 22-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are interactive decision AIDS better than passive decision AIDS? A comparison with implications for information providers on the internet

AU - Olson, Erik L.

AU - Widing, Robert E.

PY - 2002/3

Y1 - 2002/3

N2 - While much has been made of the ocean of information available on the Internet, much less emphasis has been placed on how Web surfers might actually be able to process it. This article compares an interactive (user-inputted attribute importance weights) linear computer-assisted decision aid (CADA) format with three passive CADA formats in two studies. The decision environments for these tests are difficult, involving 20 to 30 brands rated on 6 attributes, one of which is negatively correlated with the others. Because the Linear CADA rank order is based on user-inputted attribute weights, it is expected to be more in concordance with the users preference and hence is predicted to offer higher decision quality and be better liked than the passive formats. Contrary to expectations, however, a passive Equal Weight format performed as well or better than the Linear format on all objective and subjective comparison criteria, while the other two passive formats were not significantly worse on several decision quality criteria. The implications of these findings for information providers on the Internet are also discussed.

AB - While much has been made of the ocean of information available on the Internet, much less emphasis has been placed on how Web surfers might actually be able to process it. This article compares an interactive (user-inputted attribute importance weights) linear computer-assisted decision aid (CADA) format with three passive CADA formats in two studies. The decision environments for these tests are difficult, involving 20 to 30 brands rated on 6 attributes, one of which is negatively correlated with the others. Because the Linear CADA rank order is based on user-inputted attribute weights, it is expected to be more in concordance with the users preference and hence is predicted to offer higher decision quality and be better liked than the passive formats. Contrary to expectations, however, a passive Equal Weight format performed as well or better than the Linear format on all objective and subjective comparison criteria, while the other two passive formats were not significantly worse on several decision quality criteria. The implications of these findings for information providers on the Internet are also discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0039559113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/dir.10007

DO - 10.1002/dir.10007

M3 - Review article

VL - 16

SP - 22

EP - 33

JO - Journal of Interactive Marketing

T2 - Journal of Interactive Marketing

JF - Journal of Interactive Marketing

SN - 1094-9968

IS - 2

ER -