Are parents satisfied with China’s Puhui early childhood education? Evidence from a national validation study

Yifang Wang, Yu Zhou, Yong Jiang*, Hui Li, Xinxin Liu

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)
    38 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Research Findings: This study aimed to explore parental satisfaction with Puhui early childhood education (ECE) service in China using evidence from a national validation study. The Parent Satisfaction with the Puhui Early Childhood Education Service Scale (PES) was developed and validated with 4,134 Chinese parents, who were sampled using a stratified cluster sampling method. First, an examination of the PES’s psychometric properties indicated that it was a reliable and valid scale with three constructs: government responsibility, kindergarten responsibility, and children’s development. Second, descriptive statistics revealed that Chinese parents were generally satisfied with the Puhui ECE service, being most satisfied with child development and least satisfied with government responsibility. Third, latent profile analysis generated three profiles: low, medium, and high satisfaction parents. Fourth, hierarchical regression analysis found that kindergarten rating and urbanicity were significant predictors of parent satisfaction. Practice or Policy: The findings imply that more policy attention should be paid to the quality and fairness of the Puhui ECE. Moreover, this study extends the research on parent satisfaction with ECE services and provides useful tools to evaluate universal ECE services in China and beyond.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1458-1475
    Number of pages18
    JournalEarly Education and Development
    Volume34
    Issue number6
    Early online date17 Sept 2022
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 18 Aug 2023

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Are parents satisfied with China’s Puhui early childhood education? Evidence from a national validation study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this