Are there gender differences in catastrophic appraisals in panic disorder with agoraphobia?

Vladan Starcevic*, Milan Latas, Dusan Kolar, David Berle

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our aim in this study was to compare panic-related catastrophic appraisals between women and men with panic disorder with agoraphobia (PDA). One hundred two outpatients with PDA (75 women and 27 men) participated. Two instruments for the assessment of catastrophic appraisals, Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire and Panic Appraisal Inventory, were administered before and after cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) that also included pharmacotherapy in three fourths of the patients. Female and male patients did not differ significantly in terms of their tendency to anticipate catastrophic consequences of picnic, before or after CBT-based treatment. For both females and males, the tendency to make catastrophic appraisals decreased significantly with treatment. We conclude that among patients with PDA there are no gender differences in catastrophic appraisals of panic sensations and symptoms. The apparently higher risk of panic recurrence in women does not seem to be related to their panic-related catastrophic appraisals. These findings also support a notion that there is no gender difference in response to CBT-based treatment of PDA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)545-552
Number of pages8
JournalDepression and Anxiety
Volume24
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • panic disorder
  • agoraphobia
  • gender
  • risk factors
  • panic-related cognitions
  • catastrophizing
  • cognitive-behavioral therapy
  • BODY SENSATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE
  • COGNITIONS QUESTIONNAIRE
  • ANXIETY SENSITIVITY
  • AVOIDANCE
  • WOMEN
  • MEN

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are there gender differences in catastrophic appraisals in panic disorder with agoraphobia?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this