TY - JOUR
T1 - ‘As we all know’
T2 - Examining Chinese EFL learners’ use of interpersonal grammatical metaphor in academic writing
AU - Liardét, Cassi L.
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - This article investigates Chinese EFL learners’ use of evaluation and stance in academic texts by exploring their deployment of interpersonal grammatical metaphors (IGM), a construct mapped within Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL; Halliday, 1985; e.g., I BELIEVE, IT IS EVIDENT, etc.). The data is drawn from the Chinese Longitudinal Learner Corpus (CLLC), a two-year diachronic study into university learners’ development of academic literacy (Liardet, 2014a). When examining IGM, it is important to distinguish which metaphors of modality achieve the registers valued in academic discourse, namely, epistemic metaphors construed objectively (Hyland, 1998a; Schleppegrell, 2002). In the analysis of the CLLC, a widely used construction emerged, that of AS WE ALL KNOW (e.g., IT IS KNOWN TO ALL, AS WE KNOW, etc.). To account for this construct, an additional axis has been mapped across Halliday's (1985) model of IGM. Building on SFL's framework of Appraisal and specifically, the system of ‘engagement’ the axis of expansion is used here to distinguish expressions that expand the ‘dialogic space’ (e.g., IT IS SUGGESTED; Martin & White, 2005; see also, Hyland, 2000, 2002) from those that contract this space (e.g., IT IS CERTAIN). In addition to the Chinese EFL learners’ reliance on such deontic, contracting metaphors, this paper explores their preference for subjective realizations and identifies key areas for pedagogical intervention.
AB - This article investigates Chinese EFL learners’ use of evaluation and stance in academic texts by exploring their deployment of interpersonal grammatical metaphors (IGM), a construct mapped within Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL; Halliday, 1985; e.g., I BELIEVE, IT IS EVIDENT, etc.). The data is drawn from the Chinese Longitudinal Learner Corpus (CLLC), a two-year diachronic study into university learners’ development of academic literacy (Liardet, 2014a). When examining IGM, it is important to distinguish which metaphors of modality achieve the registers valued in academic discourse, namely, epistemic metaphors construed objectively (Hyland, 1998a; Schleppegrell, 2002). In the analysis of the CLLC, a widely used construction emerged, that of AS WE ALL KNOW (e.g., IT IS KNOWN TO ALL, AS WE KNOW, etc.). To account for this construct, an additional axis has been mapped across Halliday's (1985) model of IGM. Building on SFL's framework of Appraisal and specifically, the system of ‘engagement’ the axis of expansion is used here to distinguish expressions that expand the ‘dialogic space’ (e.g., IT IS SUGGESTED; Martin & White, 2005; see also, Hyland, 2000, 2002) from those that contract this space (e.g., IT IS CERTAIN). In addition to the Chinese EFL learners’ reliance on such deontic, contracting metaphors, this paper explores their preference for subjective realizations and identifies key areas for pedagogical intervention.
KW - Academic discourse
KW - Corpus analysis
KW - Grammatical metaphor
KW - Stance
KW - Systemic functional linguistics (SFL)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038099403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.005
DO - 10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85038099403
VL - 50
SP - 64
EP - 80
JO - English for Specific Purposes
JF - English for Specific Purposes
SN - 0889-4906
ER -