Asian borderlands and the legal protection of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions

Christoph Antons*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)


Traditional knowledge related to biodiversity, agriculture, medicine and artistic expressions has recently attracted much interest amongst policy makers, legal academics and social scientists. Several United Nations organizations, such as the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the Convention on Biological Diversity under the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), have been working on international models for the protection of such knowledge held by local and indigenous communities. Relevant national, regional or provincial level legislation comes in the form of intellectual property laws and laws related to health, heritage or environmental protection. In practice, however, it has proven difficult to agree on definitions of the subject matter, to delineate local communities and territories holding the knowledge, and to clearly identify the subjects and beneficiaries of the protection. In fact, claims to ‘cultural property’ and heritage have led to conflicts and tensions between communities, regions and nations. This paper will use Southeast Asian examples and case studies to show the importance of concepts such as Zomia, ‘regions of refuge’ and mandala as well as ‘borderlands’ studies to avoid essentialized notions of communities and cultures in order to develop a nuanced understanding of the difficulties for national and international lawmaking in this field. It will also develop a few suggestions on how conflicts and tensions could be avoided or ameliorated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1403-1433
Number of pages31
JournalModern Asian Studies
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes


  • Intellectual property
  • cultural property
  • borderlands
  • WIPO
  • CBD
  • Asia


Dive into the research topics of 'Asian borderlands and the legal protection of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this