Assessing alertness and engagement of children with severe intellectual and multiple disabilities

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities often appear to be passive and unresponsive to environmental stimulation. A major priority for such children is to increase the amount of time that they are alert and actively engaged. This research study examined the extent to which five children with profound/multiple impairments aged 9 – 13 years were reported by carers to indicate engagement and the extent to which these reported indices of responsiveness varied in relation to differing levels of environmental stimulation. Each child was directly observed across three different environmental conditions that varied in terms of the amount and type of stimulation provided. Carers rated the child’s level of engagement/responsiveness under each condition from videotapes using the Pittsburgh Participation Scale. Findings suggested that the carers identified a number of potential indices of engagement/responsiveness that did seem to vary reliably and consistently in relation to the amount and type of environmental stimulation being provided. These results suggest that children who appear largely passive and unresponsive might show subtle signs of engagement/responsiveness in response to higher levels of environmental stimulation. The presence of these indicators might signal times when the child is actively engaged and more likely to be responsive to instruction.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)151-160
    Number of pages10
    JournalJapanese Journal of Severe Motor and Intellectual Disabilities
    Volume45
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Keywords

    • severe impairments
    • multiple disabilities
    • engagement
    • alertness
    • assessment

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing alertness and engagement of children with severe intellectual and multiple disabilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this