Assessing preservice teachers' Presentation capabilities: Contrasting the modes of communication with the constructed impression

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A research-based understanding of how to develop and assess classroom presentation skills is vital for the effective development of preservice teacher communication capabilities. This paper identifies and compares two different models of assessing pre-service teachers' presentation performance - one based on the Modes of Communication (voice, body language, words, and alignment between those elements) and another based on features of the Constructed Impression of the communication acts (confidence, clarity, engagement and appropriateness). The Modes of Communication and the Constructed Impression of 164 pre-service teacher presentations were rated. The Constructed Impression model provided a better fit to data, while averaging of Modes of Communication elements offered more accurate prediction of overall score. All elements in both models made a significant contribution to the overall perception of communication performance. The study also reports on the relative contribution of voice, body language, words and alignment to the perceived confidence, clarity, engagement and appropriateness of the pre-service teacher presentations. Implications for developing pre-service teachers' presentation capabilities are also discussed.

LanguageEnglish
Pages111-131
Number of pages21
JournalAustralian Journal of Teacher Education
Volume38
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

communication
teacher
body language
confidence
performance
classroom

Cite this

@article{d2c28c48123249cfb21ed91f0ecc520f,
title = "Assessing preservice teachers' Presentation capabilities: Contrasting the modes of communication with the constructed impression",
abstract = "A research-based understanding of how to develop and assess classroom presentation skills is vital for the effective development of preservice teacher communication capabilities. This paper identifies and compares two different models of assessing pre-service teachers' presentation performance - one based on the Modes of Communication (voice, body language, words, and alignment between those elements) and another based on features of the Constructed Impression of the communication acts (confidence, clarity, engagement and appropriateness). The Modes of Communication and the Constructed Impression of 164 pre-service teacher presentations were rated. The Constructed Impression model provided a better fit to data, while averaging of Modes of Communication elements offered more accurate prediction of overall score. All elements in both models made a significant contribution to the overall perception of communication performance. The study also reports on the relative contribution of voice, body language, words and alignment to the perceived confidence, clarity, engagement and appropriateness of the pre-service teacher presentations. Implications for developing pre-service teachers' presentation capabilities are also discussed.",
author = "Bower, {Matt G.} and Moloney, {Robyn A.} and Cavanagh, {Michael S.} and Naomi Sweller",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.14221/ajte.2013v38n8.1",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "111--131",
journal = "Australian Journal of Teacher Education",
issn = "0313-5373",
publisher = "Social Science Press",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing preservice teachers' Presentation capabilities

T2 - Australian Journal of Teacher Education

AU - Bower, Matt G.

AU - Moloney, Robyn A.

AU - Cavanagh, Michael S.

AU - Sweller, Naomi

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - A research-based understanding of how to develop and assess classroom presentation skills is vital for the effective development of preservice teacher communication capabilities. This paper identifies and compares two different models of assessing pre-service teachers' presentation performance - one based on the Modes of Communication (voice, body language, words, and alignment between those elements) and another based on features of the Constructed Impression of the communication acts (confidence, clarity, engagement and appropriateness). The Modes of Communication and the Constructed Impression of 164 pre-service teacher presentations were rated. The Constructed Impression model provided a better fit to data, while averaging of Modes of Communication elements offered more accurate prediction of overall score. All elements in both models made a significant contribution to the overall perception of communication performance. The study also reports on the relative contribution of voice, body language, words and alignment to the perceived confidence, clarity, engagement and appropriateness of the pre-service teacher presentations. Implications for developing pre-service teachers' presentation capabilities are also discussed.

AB - A research-based understanding of how to develop and assess classroom presentation skills is vital for the effective development of preservice teacher communication capabilities. This paper identifies and compares two different models of assessing pre-service teachers' presentation performance - one based on the Modes of Communication (voice, body language, words, and alignment between those elements) and another based on features of the Constructed Impression of the communication acts (confidence, clarity, engagement and appropriateness). The Modes of Communication and the Constructed Impression of 164 pre-service teacher presentations were rated. The Constructed Impression model provided a better fit to data, while averaging of Modes of Communication elements offered more accurate prediction of overall score. All elements in both models made a significant contribution to the overall perception of communication performance. The study also reports on the relative contribution of voice, body language, words and alignment to the perceived confidence, clarity, engagement and appropriateness of the pre-service teacher presentations. Implications for developing pre-service teachers' presentation capabilities are also discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938886298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14221/ajte.2013v38n8.1

DO - 10.14221/ajte.2013v38n8.1

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 111

EP - 131

JO - Australian Journal of Teacher Education

JF - Australian Journal of Teacher Education

SN - 0313-5373

IS - 8

ER -