Assessing refugee protection claims at Australian airports: the gap between law, policy, and practice

Regina Jeffries, Daniel Ghezelbash, Asher Hirsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Australia’s current approach to processing individuals who arrive by air and raise protection claims at or before immigration clearance at Australian airports has not been previously explored. This article reveals a set of policy and procedural instructions, recently released by the Department of Home Affairs (‘DHA’) under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth), which establishes the administrative process of ‘entry screening’. The article examines entry screening within the transnational framework governing Australia’s legal obligations towards individuals seeking international protection. While much scholarly and public attention has been directed towards policies such as offshore detention and interdiction at sea, the documents reveal that policies designed to deter ‘unauthorised maritime arrivals’ have similar manifestations — and consequences — for ‘unauthorised air arrivals’. The article then turns to an analysis of domestic law, arguing that the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) does not authorise the entry screening procedures and that the procedures contradict certain statutory guarantees and procedural fairness. The documents further in-dicate that DHA lacks accurate data on protection claims made in Australian airports. Finally, the article examines why the current practice of entry screening violates Australia’s international legal obligations of non-refoulement and non-penalisation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)162-211
Number of pages50
JournalMelbourne University Law Review
Volume44
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing refugee protection claims at Australian airports: the gap between law, policy, and practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this