Assessing the relationship between prosody and reading outcomes in children using the PEPS-C

Margaret Lochrin, Joanne Arciuli, Mridula Sharma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between both receptive and expressive prosody and each of three reading outcomes: accuracy of reading aloud words, accuracy of reading aloud nonwords, and comprehension. Participants were 63 children aged 7 to 12 years. To assess prosody, we used the Profiling Elements of Prosody in Speech Communication (PEPS-C; Peppé & McCann, 2003). Results revealed that certain subtests of the PEPS-C predicted a substantial proportion of variance across reading outcomes, even after age and segmental phonological awareness have been considered. In fact, our findings suggest that the PEPS-C compares favourably with a well-established test of segmental phonological awareness, the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP; Wagner, Torgesen, & Rashotte, 1999), in terms of its power to predict variability in children’s reading.

LanguageEnglish
Pages72-85
Number of pages14
JournalScientific Studies of Reading
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Reading
comprehension
Communication
communication

Cite this

@article{9c8dc3ff45ea439d826f910f094cd747,
title = "Assessing the relationship between prosody and reading outcomes in children using the PEPS-C",
abstract = "This study investigated the relationship between both receptive and expressive prosody and each of three reading outcomes: accuracy of reading aloud words, accuracy of reading aloud nonwords, and comprehension. Participants were 63 children aged 7 to 12 years. To assess prosody, we used the Profiling Elements of Prosody in Speech Communication (PEPS-C; Pepp{\'e} & McCann, 2003). Results revealed that certain subtests of the PEPS-C predicted a substantial proportion of variance across reading outcomes, even after age and segmental phonological awareness have been considered. In fact, our findings suggest that the PEPS-C compares favourably with a well-established test of segmental phonological awareness, the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP; Wagner, Torgesen, & Rashotte, 1999), in terms of its power to predict variability in children’s reading.",
author = "Margaret Lochrin and Joanne Arciuli and Mridula Sharma",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10888438.2014.976341",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "72--85",
journal = "Scientific Studies of Reading",
issn = "1088-8438",
publisher = "Lawrence Erlbaum Associates",
number = "1",

}

Assessing the relationship between prosody and reading outcomes in children using the PEPS-C. / Lochrin, Margaret; Arciuli, Joanne; Sharma, Mridula.

In: Scientific Studies of Reading, Vol. 19, No. 1, 02.01.2015, p. 72-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the relationship between prosody and reading outcomes in children using the PEPS-C

AU - Lochrin, Margaret

AU - Arciuli, Joanne

AU - Sharma, Mridula

PY - 2015/1/2

Y1 - 2015/1/2

N2 - This study investigated the relationship between both receptive and expressive prosody and each of three reading outcomes: accuracy of reading aloud words, accuracy of reading aloud nonwords, and comprehension. Participants were 63 children aged 7 to 12 years. To assess prosody, we used the Profiling Elements of Prosody in Speech Communication (PEPS-C; Peppé & McCann, 2003). Results revealed that certain subtests of the PEPS-C predicted a substantial proportion of variance across reading outcomes, even after age and segmental phonological awareness have been considered. In fact, our findings suggest that the PEPS-C compares favourably with a well-established test of segmental phonological awareness, the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP; Wagner, Torgesen, & Rashotte, 1999), in terms of its power to predict variability in children’s reading.

AB - This study investigated the relationship between both receptive and expressive prosody and each of three reading outcomes: accuracy of reading aloud words, accuracy of reading aloud nonwords, and comprehension. Participants were 63 children aged 7 to 12 years. To assess prosody, we used the Profiling Elements of Prosody in Speech Communication (PEPS-C; Peppé & McCann, 2003). Results revealed that certain subtests of the PEPS-C predicted a substantial proportion of variance across reading outcomes, even after age and segmental phonological awareness have been considered. In fact, our findings suggest that the PEPS-C compares favourably with a well-established test of segmental phonological awareness, the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP; Wagner, Torgesen, & Rashotte, 1999), in terms of its power to predict variability in children’s reading.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920622446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10888438.2014.976341

DO - 10.1080/10888438.2014.976341

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 72

EP - 85

JO - Scientific Studies of Reading

T2 - Scientific Studies of Reading

JF - Scientific Studies of Reading

SN - 1088-8438

IS - 1

ER -