TY - GEN
T1 - Assisting Decision Making in Requirements Reconciliation
AU - Richards, Debbie
AU - Boettger, Kathrin
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Capturing a consistent, complete and valid set of requirements is a critical prerequisite for designing systems that are useful and usable. One popular technique for capturing the main chunks of functionality from the user's point of view is the specification of use cases by the development team. While there may be agreement at this high level, there are often differences in what each stakeholder perceives as the steps of the use case description. Often the description reflects the views of one or a few dominant individuals resulting in incomplete use case descriptions that do not represent the requirements of the whole group. In our approach, known as RECOCASE as we use a CASE tool to assist requirements RECOnciliation, the group identify and then asynchronously capture multiple requirements viewpoints. The use case descriptions are entered in natural language and automatically processed by our system to produce a concept lattice. The concept lattice is used to reveal common ground and differences between the stakeholders. Our group process enables conflicts to be identified and resolved, where possible, using our negotiation strategies and resolution operators.
AB - Capturing a consistent, complete and valid set of requirements is a critical prerequisite for designing systems that are useful and usable. One popular technique for capturing the main chunks of functionality from the user's point of view is the specification of use cases by the development team. While there may be agreement at this high level, there are often differences in what each stakeholder perceives as the steps of the use case description. Often the description reflects the views of one or a few dominant individuals resulting in incomplete use case descriptions that do not represent the requirements of the whole group. In our approach, known as RECOCASE as we use a CASE tool to assist requirements RECOnciliation, the group identify and then asynchronously capture multiple requirements viewpoints. The use case descriptions are entered in natural language and automatically processed by our system to produce a concept lattice. The concept lattice is used to reveal common ground and differences between the stakeholders. Our group process enables conflicts to be identified and resolved, where possible, using our negotiation strategies and resolution operators.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/1642325277
U2 - 10.1109/CSCWD.2002.1047712
DO - 10.1109/CSCWD.2002.1047712
M3 - Conference proceeding contribution
AN - SCOPUS:1642325277
SN - 8528500500
VL - 7
T3 - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on CSCW in Design, CSWD 2002
SP - 345
EP - 350
BT - Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on CSCW in Design
A2 - Shen, Weiming
A2 - Moreira de Souza, Jano
A2 - Barthes, Jean-Paul
A2 - Lin, Zongkai
PB - COPPE/UFRJ
CY - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
T2 - Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on CSCW in Design
Y2 - 25 September 2002 through 27 September 2002
ER -