Australian corporate political donation disclosures: Frequency, quality, and characteristics associated with disclosing companies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: A primary tool for managing the democratic risks posed by political donations is disclosure. In Australia, corporate donations are disclosed in government databases. Despite the potential accountability benefits, corporations are not, however, required to report this information in their annual or stand-alone reports. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the quantity and quality of voluntary reporting and seek to add to the nascent theoretical understanding of voluntary corporate political donations.

Design/methodology/approach: Corporate donors were obtained from the Australian Electoral Commission database. Annual and stand-alone reports were analysed to determine the quantity and quality of voluntary disclosures and compared to O’Donovan’s (2002) legitimation disclosure response matrix.

Findings: Of those companies with available reports, only 25 per cent reported any donation information. Longitudinal results show neither a robust increase in disclosure levels over time, nor a clear relationship between donation activity and disclosure. The findings support a legitimation tactic being applied to political donation disclosures.

Practical implications: The findings suggest that disclosure of political donations in corporate reports should be mandatory. Such reporting could facilitate aligning shareholder and citizen interests; aligning managerial and firm interests and closing disclosure loopholes.

Originality/value: The study extends the literature by evaluating donation disclosures by companies known to have made donations, considering time-series data and theorising the findings.
LanguageEnglish
Pages581-611
Number of pages31
JournalAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
Volume32
Issue number2
Early online date2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2019

Fingerprint

Disclosure
Donation
Data base
Legitimation
Shareholders
Government
Tactics
Theorizing
Accountability
Voluntary disclosure
Time series data
Design methodology

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Campaign finance
  • Corporate political donation
  • Legitimacy theory
  • Political contribution
  • Social and environmental accounting disclosures

Cite this

@article{b250f39a51fd46f9b27fe647979aa191,
title = "Australian corporate political donation disclosures: Frequency, quality, and characteristics associated with disclosing companies",
abstract = "Purpose: A primary tool for managing the democratic risks posed by political donations is disclosure. In Australia, corporate donations are disclosed in government databases. Despite the potential accountability benefits, corporations are not, however, required to report this information in their annual or stand-alone reports. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the quantity and quality of voluntary reporting and seek to add to the nascent theoretical understanding of voluntary corporate political donations.Design/methodology/approach: Corporate donors were obtained from the Australian Electoral Commission database. Annual and stand-alone reports were analysed to determine the quantity and quality of voluntary disclosures and compared to O’Donovan’s (2002) legitimation disclosure response matrix.Findings: Of those companies with available reports, only 25 per cent reported any donation information. Longitudinal results show neither a robust increase in disclosure levels over time, nor a clear relationship between donation activity and disclosure. The findings support a legitimation tactic being applied to political donation disclosures.Practical implications: The findings suggest that disclosure of political donations in corporate reports should be mandatory. Such reporting could facilitate aligning shareholder and citizen interests; aligning managerial and firm interests and closing disclosure loopholes.Originality/value: The study extends the literature by evaluating donation disclosures by companies known to have made donations, considering time-series data and theorising the findings.",
keywords = "Australia, Campaign finance, Corporate political donation, Legitimacy theory, Political contribution, Social and environmental accounting disclosures",
author = "Edward Tello and James Hazelton and Leong, {Shane Vincent}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1108/AAAJ-04-2016-2515",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "581--611",
journal = "Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal",
issn = "0951-3574",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "2",

}

Australian corporate political donation disclosures : Frequency, quality, and characteristics associated with disclosing companies. / Tello, Edward; Hazelton, James; Leong, Shane Vincent.

In: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 32, No. 2, 31.05.2019, p. 581-611.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Australian corporate political donation disclosures

T2 - Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

AU - Tello,Edward

AU - Hazelton,James

AU - Leong,Shane Vincent

PY - 2019/5/31

Y1 - 2019/5/31

N2 - Purpose: A primary tool for managing the democratic risks posed by political donations is disclosure. In Australia, corporate donations are disclosed in government databases. Despite the potential accountability benefits, corporations are not, however, required to report this information in their annual or stand-alone reports. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the quantity and quality of voluntary reporting and seek to add to the nascent theoretical understanding of voluntary corporate political donations.Design/methodology/approach: Corporate donors were obtained from the Australian Electoral Commission database. Annual and stand-alone reports were analysed to determine the quantity and quality of voluntary disclosures and compared to O’Donovan’s (2002) legitimation disclosure response matrix.Findings: Of those companies with available reports, only 25 per cent reported any donation information. Longitudinal results show neither a robust increase in disclosure levels over time, nor a clear relationship between donation activity and disclosure. The findings support a legitimation tactic being applied to political donation disclosures.Practical implications: The findings suggest that disclosure of political donations in corporate reports should be mandatory. Such reporting could facilitate aligning shareholder and citizen interests; aligning managerial and firm interests and closing disclosure loopholes.Originality/value: The study extends the literature by evaluating donation disclosures by companies known to have made donations, considering time-series data and theorising the findings.

AB - Purpose: A primary tool for managing the democratic risks posed by political donations is disclosure. In Australia, corporate donations are disclosed in government databases. Despite the potential accountability benefits, corporations are not, however, required to report this information in their annual or stand-alone reports. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the quantity and quality of voluntary reporting and seek to add to the nascent theoretical understanding of voluntary corporate political donations.Design/methodology/approach: Corporate donors were obtained from the Australian Electoral Commission database. Annual and stand-alone reports were analysed to determine the quantity and quality of voluntary disclosures and compared to O’Donovan’s (2002) legitimation disclosure response matrix.Findings: Of those companies with available reports, only 25 per cent reported any donation information. Longitudinal results show neither a robust increase in disclosure levels over time, nor a clear relationship between donation activity and disclosure. The findings support a legitimation tactic being applied to political donation disclosures.Practical implications: The findings suggest that disclosure of political donations in corporate reports should be mandatory. Such reporting could facilitate aligning shareholder and citizen interests; aligning managerial and firm interests and closing disclosure loopholes.Originality/value: The study extends the literature by evaluating donation disclosures by companies known to have made donations, considering time-series data and theorising the findings.

KW - Australia

KW - Campaign finance

KW - Corporate political donation

KW - Legitimacy theory

KW - Political contribution

KW - Social and environmental accounting disclosures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063024451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2016-2515

DO - 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2016-2515

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 581

EP - 611

JO - Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

JF - Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

SN - 0951-3574

IS - 2

ER -