Australia's boat push-back policy: hyper-legalism and obfuscation in action

Daniel Ghezelbash*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter critically examines Australia’s policy of pushing-back asylum seekers who attempt to reach Australia by boat. It begins by briefly describing Australia’s approach and the concerns it raises under international law. Attention then turns to the tactics Australia has used to evade accountability for breaches of international law which occur as part of its push-back operations. Two tactics are examined. The first is hyper-legalism, a formalistic bad faith interpretation and application of international obligations. The second is obfuscation, which involves secrecy around operations and their purported legal justification. The chapter concludes with some targeted strategies for counter-acting each of these strategies and fostering greater accountability.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRefugee externalisation policies
Subtitle of host publicationresponsibility, legitimacy and accountability
EditorsAzadeh Dastyari, Amy Nethery, Asher Hirsch
Place of PublicationLondon ; New York
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francis Group
Chapter4
Pages69-83
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781000610451, 9781003167273
ISBN (Print)9780367765071, 9780367765095
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Publication series

NameRoutledge Series on Global Order Studies
PublisherRoutledge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Australia's boat push-back policy: hyper-legalism and obfuscation in action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this