Authority, conformity and obedience: Applying Friedrich’s theory of authority to the classics

Robert Spillane, Jean Etienne Joullié*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the conformity and obedience studies of Asch and Milgram, legitimate authority is defined as a form of power to which subjects submit irrationally. This view assumes a causative process which the subjects’ behaviour is said to manifest. Furthermore, this view assumes that there is illegitimate (or malevolent) authority. Carl J. Friedrich's theory of authority as reasoned elaboration offers an alternative perspective, which reveals conceptual differences between authority and such related constructs as power and legitimacy. When these concepts are properly distinguished, a re-interpretation of the classical studies of conformity and obedience is called forth. Such an exercise produces insights into some of the discipline's most controversial, if not disturbing, results. Specifically, it leads to an understanding of laboratory conformity and obedience in rational terms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1086-1100
Number of pages15
JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
Volume61
Issue number4
Early online date17 Feb 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022

Keywords

  • authority
  • conformity
  • legitimacy
  • obedience
  • power

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Authority, conformity and obedience: Applying Friedrich’s theory of authority to the classics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this