Abstract
In the conformity and obedience studies of Asch and Milgram, legitimate authority is defined as a form of power to which subjects submit irrationally. This view assumes a causative process which the subjects’ behaviour is said to manifest. Furthermore, this view assumes that there is illegitimate (or malevolent) authority. Carl J. Friedrich's theory of authority as reasoned elaboration offers an alternative perspective, which reveals conceptual differences between authority and such related constructs as power and legitimacy. When these concepts are properly distinguished, a re-interpretation of the classical studies of conformity and obedience is called forth. Such an exercise produces insights into some of the discipline's most controversial, if not disturbing, results. Specifically, it leads to an understanding of laboratory conformity and obedience in rational terms.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1086-1100 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | British Journal of Social Psychology |
Volume | 61 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 17 Feb 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2022 |
Keywords
- authority
- conformity
- legitimacy
- obedience
- power