Barriers to evil

Paul Formosa

Barriers to evil

Paul Formosa

Department of Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper I critically investigate the conceptions of moral evil defended by Morton and Card. In the light of this investigation, I present and briefly defend the following conception of evil: An evil act is one in which the perpetrator acts in a way which, through a consideration of their circumstances, motives, intentions, responses and the like, we judge to go significantly beyond the pale of mere wrongdoing and so to be worthy of our very strongest moral condemnations, and who in so acting wrongfully inflicts lifewrecking or ending harms upon others.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	49-52
Number of pages	4
Journal	Crossroads
Volume	1
Issue number	2
Publication status	Published - 2007

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Publisher. Article originally published in Crossroads : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of history, philosophy, religion and classics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 49-52. The original article can be found at http://www.uq.edu.au/crossroads/archives.html#v1i2. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and Crossroads and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Access to Document

Publisher version (open access)Final published version, 122 KBLicence: Unspecified

http://www.uq.edu.au/crossroads/archives.html#v1i2

Cite this

@article{6281cb7715144e0da25eba544e5aa71f,

title = "Barriers to evil",

abstract = "In this paper I critically investigate the conceptions of moral evil defended by Morton and Card. In the light of this investigation, I present and briefly defend the following conception of evil: An evil act is one in which the perpetrator acts in a way which, through a consideration of their circumstances, motives, intentions, responses and the like, we judge to go significantly beyond the pale of mere wrongdoing and so to be worthy of our very strongest moral condemnations, and who in so acting wrongfully inflicts lifewrecking or ending harms upon others.",

author = "Paul Formosa",

note = "Copyright the Publisher. Article originally published in Crossroads : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of history, philosophy, religion and classics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 49-52. The original article can be found at http://www.uq.edu.au/crossroads/archives.html#v1i2. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and Crossroads and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",

year = "2007",

language = "English",

volume = "1",

pages = "49--52",

journal = "Crossroads",

issn = "1833-878X",

publisher = "Univerisity of Queensland",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to evil

AU - Formosa, Paul

N1 - Copyright the Publisher. Article originally published in Crossroads : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of history, philosophy, religion and classics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 49-52. The original article can be found at http://www.uq.edu.au/crossroads/archives.html#v1i2. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and Crossroads and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - In this paper I critically investigate the conceptions of moral evil defended by Morton and Card. In the light of this investigation, I present and briefly defend the following conception of evil: An evil act is one in which the perpetrator acts in a way which, through a consideration of their circumstances, motives, intentions, responses and the like, we judge to go significantly beyond the pale of mere wrongdoing and so to be worthy of our very strongest moral condemnations, and who in so acting wrongfully inflicts lifewrecking or ending harms upon others.

AB - In this paper I critically investigate the conceptions of moral evil defended by Morton and Card. In the light of this investigation, I present and briefly defend the following conception of evil: An evil act is one in which the perpetrator acts in a way which, through a consideration of their circumstances, motives, intentions, responses and the like, we judge to go significantly beyond the pale of mere wrongdoing and so to be worthy of our very strongest moral condemnations, and who in so acting wrongfully inflicts lifewrecking or ending harms upon others.

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 49

EP - 52

JO - Crossroads

JF - Crossroads

SN - 1833-878X

IS - 2

ER -

Barriers to evil

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this