TY - JOUR
T1 - Basic number processing deficits in developmental dyscalculia
T2 - Evidence from eye tracking
AU - Moeller, K.
AU - Neuburger, S.
AU - Kaufmann, L.
AU - Landerl, K.
AU - Nuerk, H. C.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Recent research suggests that developmental dyscalculia is associated with a subitizing deficit (i.e., the inability to quickly enumerate small sets of up to 3 objects). However, the nature of this deficit has not previously been investigated. In the present study the eye-tracking methodology was employed to clarify whether (a) the subitizing deficit of two boys with dyscalculia resulted from a general slowing in the access to magnitude representation, or (b) children with dyscalculia resort to a back-up counting strategy even for small object sets. In a dot-counting task, a standard problem size effect for the number of fixations required to encode the presented numerosity within the subitizing range was observed. Together with the finding that problem size had no impact on the average fixation duration, this result suggested that children with dyscalculia may indeed have to count, while typically developing controls are able to enumerate the number of dots in parallel, i.e., subitize. Implications for the understanding of developmental dyscalculia are considered.
AB - Recent research suggests that developmental dyscalculia is associated with a subitizing deficit (i.e., the inability to quickly enumerate small sets of up to 3 objects). However, the nature of this deficit has not previously been investigated. In the present study the eye-tracking methodology was employed to clarify whether (a) the subitizing deficit of two boys with dyscalculia resulted from a general slowing in the access to magnitude representation, or (b) children with dyscalculia resort to a back-up counting strategy even for small object sets. In a dot-counting task, a standard problem size effect for the number of fixations required to encode the presented numerosity within the subitizing range was observed. Together with the finding that problem size had no impact on the average fixation duration, this result suggested that children with dyscalculia may indeed have to count, while typically developing controls are able to enumerate the number of dots in parallel, i.e., subitize. Implications for the understanding of developmental dyscalculia are considered.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71549165465&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.09.007
DO - 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.09.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:71549165465
SN - 0885-2014
VL - 24
SP - 371
EP - 386
JO - Cognitive Development
JF - Cognitive Development
IS - 4
ER -