Behavioural plasticity and trophic niche shift: how wintering geese respond to habitat alteration

Jialin Lei, Yifei Jia, Yuyu Wang, Guangchun Lei, Cai Lu, Neil Saintilan, Li Wen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The accelerated rate of human-induced environmental change poses a significant challenge for wildlife. The ability of wild animals to adapt to environmental changes has important consequences for their fitness, survival, and reproduction. Behavioural flexibility, an immediate adjustment of behaviour in response to environmental variability, may be particularly important for coping with anthropogenic change. The main aim of this study was to quantify the response of two wintering goose species (bean goose Anser fabalis and lesser white-fronted goose Anser erythropus) to poor habitat condition at population level by studying foraging behaviour. In addition, we tested whether behavioural plasticity could alter trophic niche. We characterised foraging behaviours and calculated daily home range (HR) of the geese using global positioning system tracking data. We calculated standard ellipse areas to quantify niche width using the δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of individual geese. We linked behavioural plasticity with habitat quality using ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) models. We also tested the correlation between standard ellipse areas and HR using ANCOVA model. We found significant differences in geese foraging behaviours between years in their daily foraging area, travel distance and speed, and turning angle. Specifically, the birds increased their foraging area to satisfy their daily energy intake requirement in response to poor habitat conditions. They flew more sinuously and travelled faster and longer distances on a daily basis. For the endangered lesser white-fronted goose, all behaviour variables were associated with habitat quality. For bean goose, only HR and turning angle were correlated with habitat quality. The birds, especially the lesser white-fronted goose, may have had a higher trophic position under poor conditions. Our findings indicate that wintering geese showed a high degree of behavioural plasticity. However, more active foraging behaviours under poor habitat condition did not lead to a broader trophic niche. Habitat availability could be responsible to the divergent responses of foraging HR and isotopic niche to human-induced environmental change. Therefore, maintaining natural hydrological regimes during the critical period (i.e. September–November) to ensure that quality food resources are available is central to the future of populations of geese within the East Asian–Australasian Flyway.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1183-1195
Number of pages13
JournalFreshwater Biology
Volume64
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Fingerprint

geese
foraging behavior
home range
plasticity
niche
niches
habitat quality
environmental change
covariance analysis
foraging
ellipse
habitat
habitats
bird
habitat availability
hydrological regime
food quality
fitness
GPS
Anser

Keywords

  • behavioural response
  • hydrological regimes
  • trophic niche width
  • trophic position
  • wintering habitats

Cite this

Lei, Jialin ; Jia, Yifei ; Wang, Yuyu ; Lei, Guangchun ; Lu, Cai ; Saintilan, Neil ; Wen, Li. / Behavioural plasticity and trophic niche shift : how wintering geese respond to habitat alteration. In: Freshwater Biology. 2019 ; Vol. 64, No. 6. pp. 1183-1195.
@article{5db6e0fb4177496f9d021b83a96d55ac,
title = "Behavioural plasticity and trophic niche shift: how wintering geese respond to habitat alteration",
abstract = "The accelerated rate of human-induced environmental change poses a significant challenge for wildlife. The ability of wild animals to adapt to environmental changes has important consequences for their fitness, survival, and reproduction. Behavioural flexibility, an immediate adjustment of behaviour in response to environmental variability, may be particularly important for coping with anthropogenic change. The main aim of this study was to quantify the response of two wintering goose species (bean goose Anser fabalis and lesser white-fronted goose Anser erythropus) to poor habitat condition at population level by studying foraging behaviour. In addition, we tested whether behavioural plasticity could alter trophic niche. We characterised foraging behaviours and calculated daily home range (HR) of the geese using global positioning system tracking data. We calculated standard ellipse areas to quantify niche width using the δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of individual geese. We linked behavioural plasticity with habitat quality using ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) models. We also tested the correlation between standard ellipse areas and HR using ANCOVA model. We found significant differences in geese foraging behaviours between years in their daily foraging area, travel distance and speed, and turning angle. Specifically, the birds increased their foraging area to satisfy their daily energy intake requirement in response to poor habitat conditions. They flew more sinuously and travelled faster and longer distances on a daily basis. For the endangered lesser white-fronted goose, all behaviour variables were associated with habitat quality. For bean goose, only HR and turning angle were correlated with habitat quality. The birds, especially the lesser white-fronted goose, may have had a higher trophic position under poor conditions. Our findings indicate that wintering geese showed a high degree of behavioural plasticity. However, more active foraging behaviours under poor habitat condition did not lead to a broader trophic niche. Habitat availability could be responsible to the divergent responses of foraging HR and isotopic niche to human-induced environmental change. Therefore, maintaining natural hydrological regimes during the critical period (i.e. September–November) to ensure that quality food resources are available is central to the future of populations of geese within the East Asian–Australasian Flyway.",
keywords = "behavioural response, hydrological regimes, trophic niche width, trophic position, wintering habitats",
author = "Jialin Lei and Yifei Jia and Yuyu Wang and Guangchun Lei and Cai Lu and Neil Saintilan and Li Wen",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/fwb.13294",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "1183--1195",
journal = "Freshwater Biology",
issn = "0046-5070",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "6",

}

Behavioural plasticity and trophic niche shift : how wintering geese respond to habitat alteration. / Lei, Jialin; Jia, Yifei; Wang, Yuyu; Lei, Guangchun; Lu, Cai; Saintilan, Neil; Wen, Li.

In: Freshwater Biology, Vol. 64, No. 6, 06.2019, p. 1183-1195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioural plasticity and trophic niche shift

T2 - Freshwater Biology

AU - Lei,Jialin

AU - Jia,Yifei

AU - Wang,Yuyu

AU - Lei,Guangchun

AU - Lu,Cai

AU - Saintilan,Neil

AU - Wen,Li

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - The accelerated rate of human-induced environmental change poses a significant challenge for wildlife. The ability of wild animals to adapt to environmental changes has important consequences for their fitness, survival, and reproduction. Behavioural flexibility, an immediate adjustment of behaviour in response to environmental variability, may be particularly important for coping with anthropogenic change. The main aim of this study was to quantify the response of two wintering goose species (bean goose Anser fabalis and lesser white-fronted goose Anser erythropus) to poor habitat condition at population level by studying foraging behaviour. In addition, we tested whether behavioural plasticity could alter trophic niche. We characterised foraging behaviours and calculated daily home range (HR) of the geese using global positioning system tracking data. We calculated standard ellipse areas to quantify niche width using the δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of individual geese. We linked behavioural plasticity with habitat quality using ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) models. We also tested the correlation between standard ellipse areas and HR using ANCOVA model. We found significant differences in geese foraging behaviours between years in their daily foraging area, travel distance and speed, and turning angle. Specifically, the birds increased their foraging area to satisfy their daily energy intake requirement in response to poor habitat conditions. They flew more sinuously and travelled faster and longer distances on a daily basis. For the endangered lesser white-fronted goose, all behaviour variables were associated with habitat quality. For bean goose, only HR and turning angle were correlated with habitat quality. The birds, especially the lesser white-fronted goose, may have had a higher trophic position under poor conditions. Our findings indicate that wintering geese showed a high degree of behavioural plasticity. However, more active foraging behaviours under poor habitat condition did not lead to a broader trophic niche. Habitat availability could be responsible to the divergent responses of foraging HR and isotopic niche to human-induced environmental change. Therefore, maintaining natural hydrological regimes during the critical period (i.e. September–November) to ensure that quality food resources are available is central to the future of populations of geese within the East Asian–Australasian Flyway.

AB - The accelerated rate of human-induced environmental change poses a significant challenge for wildlife. The ability of wild animals to adapt to environmental changes has important consequences for their fitness, survival, and reproduction. Behavioural flexibility, an immediate adjustment of behaviour in response to environmental variability, may be particularly important for coping with anthropogenic change. The main aim of this study was to quantify the response of two wintering goose species (bean goose Anser fabalis and lesser white-fronted goose Anser erythropus) to poor habitat condition at population level by studying foraging behaviour. In addition, we tested whether behavioural plasticity could alter trophic niche. We characterised foraging behaviours and calculated daily home range (HR) of the geese using global positioning system tracking data. We calculated standard ellipse areas to quantify niche width using the δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of individual geese. We linked behavioural plasticity with habitat quality using ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) models. We also tested the correlation between standard ellipse areas and HR using ANCOVA model. We found significant differences in geese foraging behaviours between years in their daily foraging area, travel distance and speed, and turning angle. Specifically, the birds increased their foraging area to satisfy their daily energy intake requirement in response to poor habitat conditions. They flew more sinuously and travelled faster and longer distances on a daily basis. For the endangered lesser white-fronted goose, all behaviour variables were associated with habitat quality. For bean goose, only HR and turning angle were correlated with habitat quality. The birds, especially the lesser white-fronted goose, may have had a higher trophic position under poor conditions. Our findings indicate that wintering geese showed a high degree of behavioural plasticity. However, more active foraging behaviours under poor habitat condition did not lead to a broader trophic niche. Habitat availability could be responsible to the divergent responses of foraging HR and isotopic niche to human-induced environmental change. Therefore, maintaining natural hydrological regimes during the critical period (i.e. September–November) to ensure that quality food resources are available is central to the future of populations of geese within the East Asian–Australasian Flyway.

KW - behavioural response

KW - hydrological regimes

KW - trophic niche width

KW - trophic position

KW - wintering habitats

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063286763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/fwb.13294

DO - 10.1111/fwb.13294

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 1183

EP - 1195

JO - Freshwater Biology

JF - Freshwater Biology

SN - 0046-5070

IS - 6

ER -