TY - JOUR
T1 - Belief revision and delusions
T2 - how do patients with schizophrenia take advice?
AU - Kaliuzhna, Mariia
AU - Chambon, Valérian
AU - Franck, Nicolas
AU - Testud, Bérangère
AU - van der Henst, Jean Baptiste
PY - 2012/4/20
Y1 - 2012/4/20
N2 - The dominant cognitive model that accounts for the persistence of delusional beliefs in schizophrenia postulates that patients suffer from a general deficit in belief revision. It is generally assumed that this deficit is a consequence of impaired reasoning skills. However, the possibility that such inflexibility affects the entire system of a patient's beliefs has rarely been empirically tested. Using delusion-neutral material in a well-documented advice-taking task, the present study reports that patients with schizophrenia: 1) revise their beliefs, 2) take into account socially provided information to do so, 3) are not overconfident about their judgments, and 4) show less egocentric advice-discounting than controls. This study thus shows that delusional patients' difficulty in revising beliefs is more selective than had been previously assumed. The specificities of the task and the implications for a theory of delusion formation are discussed.
AB - The dominant cognitive model that accounts for the persistence of delusional beliefs in schizophrenia postulates that patients suffer from a general deficit in belief revision. It is generally assumed that this deficit is a consequence of impaired reasoning skills. However, the possibility that such inflexibility affects the entire system of a patient's beliefs has rarely been empirically tested. Using delusion-neutral material in a well-documented advice-taking task, the present study reports that patients with schizophrenia: 1) revise their beliefs, 2) take into account socially provided information to do so, 3) are not overconfident about their judgments, and 4) show less egocentric advice-discounting than controls. This study thus shows that delusional patients' difficulty in revising beliefs is more selective than had been previously assumed. The specificities of the task and the implications for a theory of delusion formation are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860000123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0034771
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0034771
M3 - Article
C2 - 22536329
AN - SCOPUS:84860000123
VL - 7
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
SN - 1932-6203
IS - 4
M1 - e34771
ER -