Benchmarking two Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains for growth and transcriptional response to methanol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

One-carbon compounds, such as methanol, are becoming potential alternatives to sugars as feedstocks for the biological production of chemicals, fuels, foods, and pharmaceuticals. Efficient biological production often requires extensive genetic manipulation of a microbial host strain, making well-characterised and genetically-tractable model organisms like the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae attractive targets for the engineering of methylotrophic metabolism. S. cerevisiae strains S288C and CEN.PK are the two best-characterised and most widely used hosts for yeast synthetic biology and metabolic engineering, yet they have unpredictable metabolic phenotypes related to their many genomic differences. We therefore sought to benchmark these two strains as potential hosts for engineered methylotrophic metabolism by comparing their growth and transcriptomic responses to methanol. CEN.PK had improved growth in the presence of methanol relative to the S288C derivative BY4741. The CEN.PK transcriptome also had a specific and relevant response to methanol that was either absent or less pronounced in the BY4741 strain. This response included up-regulation of genes associated with mitochondrial and peroxisomal metabolism, alcohol and formate dehydrogenation, glutathione metabolism, and the global transcriptional regulator of metabolism MIG3. Over-expression of MIG3 enabled improved growth in the presence of methanol, suggesting that MIG3 is a mediator of the superior CEN.PK strain growth. CEN.PK was therefore identified as a superior strain for the future development of synthetic methylotrophy in S. cerevisiae.

LanguageEnglish
Pages180-188
Number of pages9
JournalSynthetic and Systems Biotechnology
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Benchmarking
Metabolism
Yeast
Methanol
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Growth
formic acid
Yeasts
Synthetic Biology
Metabolic engineering
Metabolic Engineering
Dehydrogenation
Transcriptome
Sugars
Drug products
Feedstocks
Glutathione
Alcohols
Up-Regulation
Carbon

Keywords

  • Yeast
  • Methylotrophy
  • Synthetic biology
  • Metabolic engineering
  • MIG3
  • Methanol

Cite this

@article{70f17609e952414fb272a03237d9c18c,
title = "Benchmarking two Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains for growth and transcriptional response to methanol",
abstract = "One-carbon compounds, such as methanol, are becoming potential alternatives to sugars as feedstocks for the biological production of chemicals, fuels, foods, and pharmaceuticals. Efficient biological production often requires extensive genetic manipulation of a microbial host strain, making well-characterised and genetically-tractable model organisms like the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae attractive targets for the engineering of methylotrophic metabolism. S. cerevisiae strains S288C and CEN.PK are the two best-characterised and most widely used hosts for yeast synthetic biology and metabolic engineering, yet they have unpredictable metabolic phenotypes related to their many genomic differences. We therefore sought to benchmark these two strains as potential hosts for engineered methylotrophic metabolism by comparing their growth and transcriptomic responses to methanol. CEN.PK had improved growth in the presence of methanol relative to the S288C derivative BY4741. The CEN.PK transcriptome also had a specific and relevant response to methanol that was either absent or less pronounced in the BY4741 strain. This response included up-regulation of genes associated with mitochondrial and peroxisomal metabolism, alcohol and formate dehydrogenation, glutathione metabolism, and the global transcriptional regulator of metabolism MIG3. Over-expression of MIG3 enabled improved growth in the presence of methanol, suggesting that MIG3 is a mediator of the superior CEN.PK strain growth. CEN.PK was therefore identified as a superior strain for the future development of synthetic methylotrophy in S. cerevisiae.",
keywords = "Yeast, Methylotrophy, Synthetic biology, Metabolic engineering, MIG3, Methanol",
author = "Espinosa, {Monica I.} and Williams, {Thomas C.} and Pretorius, {Isak S.} and Paulsen, {Ian T.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.synbio.2019.10.001",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "180--188",
journal = "Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology",
issn = "2405-805X",
publisher = "KeAi Communications Co",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benchmarking two Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains for growth and transcriptional response to methanol

AU - Espinosa, Monica I.

AU - Williams, Thomas C.

AU - Pretorius, Isak S.

AU - Paulsen, Ian T.

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - One-carbon compounds, such as methanol, are becoming potential alternatives to sugars as feedstocks for the biological production of chemicals, fuels, foods, and pharmaceuticals. Efficient biological production often requires extensive genetic manipulation of a microbial host strain, making well-characterised and genetically-tractable model organisms like the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae attractive targets for the engineering of methylotrophic metabolism. S. cerevisiae strains S288C and CEN.PK are the two best-characterised and most widely used hosts for yeast synthetic biology and metabolic engineering, yet they have unpredictable metabolic phenotypes related to their many genomic differences. We therefore sought to benchmark these two strains as potential hosts for engineered methylotrophic metabolism by comparing their growth and transcriptomic responses to methanol. CEN.PK had improved growth in the presence of methanol relative to the S288C derivative BY4741. The CEN.PK transcriptome also had a specific and relevant response to methanol that was either absent or less pronounced in the BY4741 strain. This response included up-regulation of genes associated with mitochondrial and peroxisomal metabolism, alcohol and formate dehydrogenation, glutathione metabolism, and the global transcriptional regulator of metabolism MIG3. Over-expression of MIG3 enabled improved growth in the presence of methanol, suggesting that MIG3 is a mediator of the superior CEN.PK strain growth. CEN.PK was therefore identified as a superior strain for the future development of synthetic methylotrophy in S. cerevisiae.

AB - One-carbon compounds, such as methanol, are becoming potential alternatives to sugars as feedstocks for the biological production of chemicals, fuels, foods, and pharmaceuticals. Efficient biological production often requires extensive genetic manipulation of a microbial host strain, making well-characterised and genetically-tractable model organisms like the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae attractive targets for the engineering of methylotrophic metabolism. S. cerevisiae strains S288C and CEN.PK are the two best-characterised and most widely used hosts for yeast synthetic biology and metabolic engineering, yet they have unpredictable metabolic phenotypes related to their many genomic differences. We therefore sought to benchmark these two strains as potential hosts for engineered methylotrophic metabolism by comparing their growth and transcriptomic responses to methanol. CEN.PK had improved growth in the presence of methanol relative to the S288C derivative BY4741. The CEN.PK transcriptome also had a specific and relevant response to methanol that was either absent or less pronounced in the BY4741 strain. This response included up-regulation of genes associated with mitochondrial and peroxisomal metabolism, alcohol and formate dehydrogenation, glutathione metabolism, and the global transcriptional regulator of metabolism MIG3. Over-expression of MIG3 enabled improved growth in the presence of methanol, suggesting that MIG3 is a mediator of the superior CEN.PK strain growth. CEN.PK was therefore identified as a superior strain for the future development of synthetic methylotrophy in S. cerevisiae.

KW - Yeast

KW - Methylotrophy

KW - Synthetic biology

KW - Metabolic engineering

KW - MIG3

KW - Methanol

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073208194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.synbio.2019.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.synbio.2019.10.001

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 180

EP - 188

JO - Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology

T2 - Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology

JF - Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology

SN - 2405-805X

IS - 4

ER -