Between universalism and targeting: exploring policy pathways for an Australian Basic Income

Ben Spies-Butcher*, Ben Phillips, Troy Henderson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite growing interest in proposals for a universal basic income, little advance has been made in implementation. Here we explore policy options for an Australian Basic Income. Our analysis responds to concerns that Basic Income is both too expensive and too radical a departure from existing welfare state structures to be a feasible policy option. Drawing on policy and Basic Income scholarship we identify changes to Australia’s current means-tested benefits structures that move substantially towards Basic Income while remaining consistent with historic policy norms, which we call ‘affluence testing’. Using microsimulation we explore fiscal and distributional trade-offs associated with the implementation of an affluence-tested Basic Income. Our results suggest Basic Income has the potential to significantly reduce inequality and poverty while also requiring taxes to rise substantially. Placing these trade-offs in international context we find the policy would reduce inequality to levels similar to Nordic welfare states while increasing overall taxation to approximately the OECD average.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)502-523
Number of pages22
JournalEconomic and Labour Relations Review
Volume31
Issue number4
Early online date19 Oct 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2020

Keywords

  • basic income
  • fiscal policy
  • income distribution
  • social policy
  • taxation/taxation system/taxation policy
  • welfare state

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Between universalism and targeting: exploring policy pathways for an Australian Basic Income'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this