TY - CHAP
T1 - Beyond control
T2 - Will to Power in AI
AU - Hipólito, Inês
AU - Podosky, Paul Mikhail Catapang
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Sensational claims portray AI as an entity beyond human control. We argue that while AI may exhibit characteristics that appear “beyond control,” this does not necessarily arise from its status as an independent entity. The prevalent “out-of-control” AI narrative obscures meaningful discussions on how we can effectively govern AI. This paper introduces a novel theoretical framework based on two variables: controllable/non-controllable AI and value-free/value-laden AI, yielding four distinct perspectives on AI ontology: Value-Free Instrumentalism, Determinism, Value-Laden Critical Theory, and Substantialism. We contend that AI's perceived lack of control stems not from value-free mind-independence, but from value-laden sociocultural power dynamics. Through the lens of Critical Theory, we elucidate that AI remains subject to control, despite prevalent perceptions suggesting otherwise. While AI may present legitimate existential concerns, these do not stem from an inherent “out-of-control” state, but rather from the exertion of control by entities whose motives may not align with public interest. This analysis aims to shift the discourse from panic-driven narratives to a nuanced understanding of AI's controllability, fostering more effective approaches to AI governance and development.
AB - Sensational claims portray AI as an entity beyond human control. We argue that while AI may exhibit characteristics that appear “beyond control,” this does not necessarily arise from its status as an independent entity. The prevalent “out-of-control” AI narrative obscures meaningful discussions on how we can effectively govern AI. This paper introduces a novel theoretical framework based on two variables: controllable/non-controllable AI and value-free/value-laden AI, yielding four distinct perspectives on AI ontology: Value-Free Instrumentalism, Determinism, Value-Laden Critical Theory, and Substantialism. We contend that AI's perceived lack of control stems not from value-free mind-independence, but from value-laden sociocultural power dynamics. Through the lens of Critical Theory, we elucidate that AI remains subject to control, despite prevalent perceptions suggesting otherwise. While AI may present legitimate existential concerns, these do not stem from an inherent “out-of-control” state, but rather from the exertion of control by entities whose motives may not align with public interest. This analysis aims to shift the discourse from panic-driven narratives to a nuanced understanding of AI's controllability, fostering more effective approaches to AI governance and development.
KW - AI consciousness
KW - Controllability in AI
KW - Deterministic entity
KW - Mind-independence
KW - Sociocultural power dynamics
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020928576
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-99654-2_4
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-99654-2_4
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:105020928576
SN - 9783031996535
SN - 9783031996566
T3 - Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
SP - 55
EP - 85
BT - Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence
A2 - Pantsar, Markus
A2 - Stjernfelt, Frederik
A2 - Gramelsberger, Gabriele
A2 - Olteanu, Alin
PB - Springer, Springer Nature
CY - Cham, Switzerland
ER -