Beyond species counts for assessing, valuing, and conserving biodiversity: response to Wallach et al. 2019

Ninon F.V. Meyer*, Niko Balkenhol, Trishna Dutta, Maarten Hofman, Jean-Yves Meyer, Euan G. Ritchie, Charlotte Alley, Chad Beranek, Cassandra K. Bugir, Alex Callen, Simon Clulow, Michael V. Cove, Kaya Klop-Toker, Omar R. Lopez, Michael Mahony, Robert Scanlon, Sandeep Sharma, Elen Shute, Rose Upton, Emy GuilbaultAndrea S. Griffin, Edwin Hernández Pérez, Lachlan G. Howell, John-Paul King, Dean Lenga, Patrick O Donoghue, Matt W. Hayward

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/opinion

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Article impact statement: Combining native and non-native species to evaluate biodiversity is overly simplistic and may undermine the conservation of ecosystems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-372
Number of pages4
JournalConservation Biology
Volume35
Issue number1
Early online date22 Dec 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Publisher 2020. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Extinction
  • Invasion
  • Mammals

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond species counts for assessing, valuing, and conserving biodiversity: response to Wallach et al. 2019'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this