Beyond species counts for assessing, valuing, and conserving biodiversity: response to Wallach et al. 2019

Ninon F.V. Meyer*, Niko Balkenhol, Trishna Dutta, Maarten Hofman, Jean-Yves Meyer, Euan G. Ritchie, Charlotte Alley, Chad Beranek, Cassandra K. Bugir, Alex Callen, Simon Clulow, Michael V. Cove, Kaya Klop-Toker, Omar R. Lopez, Michael Mahony, Robert Scanlon, Sandeep Sharma, Elen Shute, Rose Upton, Emy GuilbaultAndrea S. Griffin, Edwin Hernández Pérez, Lachlan G. Howell, John-Paul King, Dean Lenga, Patrick O Donoghue, Matt W. Hayward

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/opinion

    4 Citations (Scopus)
    51 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Article impact statement: Combining native and non-native species to evaluate biodiversity is overly simplistic and may undermine the conservation of ecosystems.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)369-372
    Number of pages4
    JournalConservation Biology
    Volume35
    Issue number1
    Early online date22 Dec 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright the Publisher 2020. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

    Keywords

    • Extinction
    • Invasion
    • Mammals

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond species counts for assessing, valuing, and conserving biodiversity: response to Wallach et al. 2019'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this