Beyond the 'Bayesian blur' predictive processing and the nature of subjective experience

Andy Clark*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent work in cognitive and computational neuroscience depicts the brain as in some (perhaps merely approximate) sense implementing probabilistic inference. This suggests a puzzle. If the processing that enables perceptual experience involves representing or approximating probability distributions, why does experience itself appear univocal and determinate, apparently bearing no traces of those probabilistic roots? In this paper, I canvass a range of responses, including the denial of univocality and determinacy itself. I argue that there is reason to think that it is our conception of perception itself that is flawed. Once we see perception aright, as the slave of action, the puzzlement recedes. Perceptual determinacy reflects only the mundane fact that we are embodied, active, agents who must constantly engage the world they perceptually encounter.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-87
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Consciousness Studies
Volume25
Issue number3-4
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond the 'Bayesian blur' predictive processing and the nature of subjective experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this