Abstract
This special section builds on Planning the Post-Political City—Part 1 to examine if and how planning is showing signs of a post-democratic turn taking place in Australian cities. In Part 1, we presented a collection of papers examining Australia as a post-political landscape, exploring the new ways in which Australian publics are resisting dominant neoliberal practices and logics of growth and, in doing so, are intervening in decision-making practices to assert new forms of power and participation. In Part 2, we show how participatory practices continue to evolve. We use this brief editorial to ask a foundational question: have those implicated in the governance and management of Australian cities embarked on a post-democratic path? As they are presented with new exclusionary and managerial governance systems, the public's participation suggests at the very least that post-political and post-democratic conditions are neither immutable nor inevitable. However, more democratic forms of governance rely on a rich array of activist types and approaches requiring greater institutional support in order to challenge Australia's post-political condition.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 353-357 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Geographical Research |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 14 Sept 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2018 |
Keywords
- activism
- Australian cities
- participation
- post-democracy
- post-politics
- urban politics