Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bodily minded skill: active inference, flowing individuals, and the credit we owe them

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The flow state has historically been a source of mystery and, at times, mysticism. Whereas some accounts of flow allude to the flowing individual’s conscious absorption and focus, others imply that the individual is, in fact, not conscious. If we take this latter model seriously, our intuition that those in flow ought to be creditable for their acts becomes deeply threatened. However, there is good reason to believe that this mindless account of flow is wrong. Recent work in theoretical cognitive science suggests that flow is an exhibition of bodily minded skill in which consciousness plays a central part. Although this account might salvage more creditability for the minded flowing individual than their mindless counterpart, under a recent axiological framework, it remains ambiguous just how creditable such minded individuals emerge, insofar as the taxonomy fails to cover the role played by subdoxastic intentions and desires in skilful activity. We thus propose a refinement of the framework, which accounts for how these flowing individuals are just as intentional, agentive, skilful, and thus creditable as any non-flowing counterpart who achieves the same material outcome.
Original languageEnglish
Article number109
Pages (from-to)1-37
Number of pages37
JournalSynthese
Volume207
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Mar 2026

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2026. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • flow
  • active inference, creditability
  • Dreyfus
  • philosophy of action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bodily minded skill: active inference, flowing individuals, and the credit we owe them'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this