Border clashes

the distributive politics of professional liberalisation in Greece, 2010–2018

Francesco Stolfi*, Natalia Papamakariou

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article studies the political conflict surrounding the implementation of the European Union's Services Directive in Greece between 2010 and 2018, the period in which the country was subject to external conditionality by external institutions. Focusing on the opening of jurisdictional boundaries for four professions (tourist guides, taxi owners, lawyers and engineers) that differ in terms of power and of organisational structure, we find that power differences, including control of the professions' institutions of interest aggregation and representation, explain the liberalisation outcomes across the four professions. This article thus puts the spotlight on the role of domestic interest groups in the implementation of EU legislation and directs researchers' attention to the broader issue of bias in interest intermediation, a classic, but lately understudied, issue in the study of politics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)90-110
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Public Policy
Volume41
Issue number1
Early online date29 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Jul 2019

Keywords

  • Compliance
  • Greece
  • Services Directive
  • interest groups
  • liberalisation
  • professions

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Border clashes: the distributive politics of professional liberalisation in Greece, 2010–2018'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this